When blame avoidance backfires: Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
When blame avoidance backfires : Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic. / Porumbescu, Gregory; Moynihan, Donald; Anastasopoulos, Jason; Olsen, Asmus Leth.
In: Governance, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2023, p. 779-803.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - When blame avoidance backfires
T2 - Responses to performance framing and outgroup scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Porumbescu, Gregory
AU - Moynihan, Donald
AU - Anastasopoulos, Jason
AU - Olsen, Asmus Leth
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Public officials use blame avoidance strategies when communicating performance information. While such strategies typically involve shifting blame to political opponents or other governments, we examine how they might direct blame to ethnic groups. We focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, where the Trump administration sought to shift blame by scapegoating (using the term "Chinese virus") and mitigate blame by positively framing performance information on COVID-19 testing. Using a novel experimental design that leverages machine learning techniques, we find scapegoating outgroups backfired, leading to greater blame of political leadership for the poor administrative response, especially among conservatives. Backlash was strongest for negatively framed performance data, demonstrating that performance framing shapes blame avoidance outcomes. We discuss how divisive blame avoidance strategies may alienate even supporters.
AB - Public officials use blame avoidance strategies when communicating performance information. While such strategies typically involve shifting blame to political opponents or other governments, we examine how they might direct blame to ethnic groups. We focus on the COVID-19 pandemic, where the Trump administration sought to shift blame by scapegoating (using the term "Chinese virus") and mitigate blame by positively framing performance information on COVID-19 testing. Using a novel experimental design that leverages machine learning techniques, we find scapegoating outgroups backfired, leading to greater blame of political leadership for the poor administrative response, especially among conservatives. Backlash was strongest for negatively framed performance data, demonstrating that performance framing shapes blame avoidance outcomes. We discuss how divisive blame avoidance strategies may alienate even supporters.
KW - ATTRIBUTIONS
KW - POLITICS
KW - RACE
U2 - 10.1111/gove.12701
DO - 10.1111/gove.12701
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35942431
VL - 36
SP - 779
EP - 803
JO - Governance
JF - Governance
SN - 0952-1895
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 342569015