Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research

Standard

Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust. / Dinesen, Peter Thisted; Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar; Thuesen, Frederik.

2019. 1-61 Paper presented at Immigration: Research Frontiers & Policy Challenges, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research

Harvard

Dinesen, PT, Sønderskov, KM & Thuesen, F 2019, 'Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust', Paper presented at Immigration: Research Frontiers & Policy Challenges, Philadelphia, United States, 04/10/2019 - 05/10/2019 pp. 1-61.

APA

Dinesen, P. T., Sønderskov, K. M., & Thuesen, F. (2019). Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust. 1-61. Paper presented at Immigration: Research Frontiers & Policy Challenges, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Vancouver

Dinesen PT, Sønderskov KM, Thuesen F. Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust. 2019. Paper presented at Immigration: Research Frontiers & Policy Challenges, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Author

Dinesen, Peter Thisted ; Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar ; Thuesen, Frederik. / Working Together? Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust. Paper presented at Immigration: Research Frontiers & Policy Challenges, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.61 p.

Bibtex

@conference{07958e8d5e9643d7a07f6a1ab2e607d8,
title = "Working Together?: Ethnic Diversity in the Workplace and Generalized Social Trust",
abstract = "Several influential studies show that living in more ethnically diverse settings erodes generalized social trust among the native-born population. Yet, critics argue that this is a biased portrayal of the consequences of ethnic diversity for trust because co-habitation only entails superficial, stereotype-confirming exposure to other ethnic groups rather than meaningful contact with them. Conversely, interethnic contact can in fact build up, rather than erode, generalized social trust, according to this perspective. However, putting the “contact argument” to a convincing empirical test has been complicated by several methodological challenges. In this paper, we provide a rigorous test of this argument by studying a contact-prone context—the workplace—using registrylinked survey data from Denmark. Despite setting the scene for the contact argument, our empirical analyses consistently show a negative effect of ethnic diversity in the workplace on social trust. This result holds in a series of analyses, including in panel data models. Our results thus provide little support for the contact argument, and instead vindicate theories highlighting the negative consequences of ethnic diversity for trust.",
author = "Dinesen, {Peter Thisted} and S{\o}nderskov, {Kim Mannemar} and Frederik Thuesen",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
pages = "1--61",
note = "null ; Conference date: 04-10-2019 Through 05-10-2019",
url = "https://web.sas.upenn.edu/pic-lab/2019-conference-on-immigration/",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Working Together?

AU - Dinesen, Peter Thisted

AU - Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar

AU - Thuesen, Frederik

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Several influential studies show that living in more ethnically diverse settings erodes generalized social trust among the native-born population. Yet, critics argue that this is a biased portrayal of the consequences of ethnic diversity for trust because co-habitation only entails superficial, stereotype-confirming exposure to other ethnic groups rather than meaningful contact with them. Conversely, interethnic contact can in fact build up, rather than erode, generalized social trust, according to this perspective. However, putting the “contact argument” to a convincing empirical test has been complicated by several methodological challenges. In this paper, we provide a rigorous test of this argument by studying a contact-prone context—the workplace—using registrylinked survey data from Denmark. Despite setting the scene for the contact argument, our empirical analyses consistently show a negative effect of ethnic diversity in the workplace on social trust. This result holds in a series of analyses, including in panel data models. Our results thus provide little support for the contact argument, and instead vindicate theories highlighting the negative consequences of ethnic diversity for trust.

AB - Several influential studies show that living in more ethnically diverse settings erodes generalized social trust among the native-born population. Yet, critics argue that this is a biased portrayal of the consequences of ethnic diversity for trust because co-habitation only entails superficial, stereotype-confirming exposure to other ethnic groups rather than meaningful contact with them. Conversely, interethnic contact can in fact build up, rather than erode, generalized social trust, according to this perspective. However, putting the “contact argument” to a convincing empirical test has been complicated by several methodological challenges. In this paper, we provide a rigorous test of this argument by studying a contact-prone context—the workplace—using registrylinked survey data from Denmark. Despite setting the scene for the contact argument, our empirical analyses consistently show a negative effect of ethnic diversity in the workplace on social trust. This result holds in a series of analyses, including in panel data models. Our results thus provide little support for the contact argument, and instead vindicate theories highlighting the negative consequences of ethnic diversity for trust.

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 61

Y2 - 4 October 2019 through 5 October 2019

ER -

ID: 228780040