Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies. / Pedersen, Helene Helboe; Halpin, Darren; Rasmussen, Anne.

In: Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 6, 2015, p. 408-427.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, HH, Halpin, D & Rasmussen, A 2015, 'Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies', Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, 6, pp. 408-427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292

APA

Pedersen, H. H., Halpin, D., & Rasmussen, A. (2015). Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies. Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(3), 408-427. [6]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292

Vancouver

Pedersen HH, Halpin D, Rasmussen A. Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies. Journal of Legislative Studies. 2015;21(3):408-427. 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292

Author

Pedersen, Helene Helboe ; Halpin, Darren ; Rasmussen, Anne. / Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees? A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies. In: Journal of Legislative Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 408-427.

Bibtex

@article{8288ab5317524ac5a163985188bd40c6,
title = "Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees?: A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies",
abstract = "This article focuses on the interaction between parliamentary committees and external actors. How is the interaction organised, and how does it influence which interests are voiced? The authors show that institutional variation in procedures for calling witnesses and variation in committee agendas influence both the composition of actors and the concentration of evidence. By composition of actors, they refer to the set of different actor types involved. By evidence concentration, they refer to the extent to which evidence is provided by a relatively small share of active actors. The study is based on a new data set of all contacts between parliamentary committees and external actors in one year across three countries: the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands. Interestingly, the findings show that procedures of invitation rather than open calls increase the diversity of actor composition and decrease the concentration of actor evidence. This, however, comes at a cost, since the overall volume of contacts is reduced.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, comparative study, interest groups, institutions, parliamentary committees, Representation",
author = "Pedersen, {Helene Helboe} and Darren Halpin and Anne Rasmussen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "408--427",
journal = "The Journal of Legislative Studies",
issn = "1357-2334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Gives Evidence to Parliamentary Committees?

T2 - A Comparative Investigation of Parliamentary Committees and their Constituencies

AU - Pedersen, Helene Helboe

AU - Halpin, Darren

AU - Rasmussen, Anne

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article focuses on the interaction between parliamentary committees and external actors. How is the interaction organised, and how does it influence which interests are voiced? The authors show that institutional variation in procedures for calling witnesses and variation in committee agendas influence both the composition of actors and the concentration of evidence. By composition of actors, they refer to the set of different actor types involved. By evidence concentration, they refer to the extent to which evidence is provided by a relatively small share of active actors. The study is based on a new data set of all contacts between parliamentary committees and external actors in one year across three countries: the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands. Interestingly, the findings show that procedures of invitation rather than open calls increase the diversity of actor composition and decrease the concentration of actor evidence. This, however, comes at a cost, since the overall volume of contacts is reduced.

AB - This article focuses on the interaction between parliamentary committees and external actors. How is the interaction organised, and how does it influence which interests are voiced? The authors show that institutional variation in procedures for calling witnesses and variation in committee agendas influence both the composition of actors and the concentration of evidence. By composition of actors, they refer to the set of different actor types involved. By evidence concentration, they refer to the extent to which evidence is provided by a relatively small share of active actors. The study is based on a new data set of all contacts between parliamentary committees and external actors in one year across three countries: the United Kingdom, Denmark and the Netherlands. Interestingly, the findings show that procedures of invitation rather than open calls increase the diversity of actor composition and decrease the concentration of actor evidence. This, however, comes at a cost, since the overall volume of contacts is reduced.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - comparative study

KW - interest groups

KW - institutions

KW - parliamentary committees

KW - Representation

U2 - 10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292

DO - 10.1080/13572334.2015.1042292

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 408

EP - 427

JO - The Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - The Journal of Legislative Studies

SN - 1357-2334

IS - 3

M1 - 6

ER -

ID: 106153253