Victor's memory: Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Victor's memory : Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective. / McCargo, Duncan; Senaratne, Dishani.

In: Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.01.2020, p. 97-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

McCargo, D & Senaratne, D 2020, 'Victor's memory: Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective', Conflict, Security & Development, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070

APA

McCargo, D., & Senaratne, D. (2020). Victor's memory: Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective. Conflict, Security & Development, 20(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070

Vancouver

McCargo D, Senaratne D. Victor's memory: Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective. Conflict, Security & Development. 2020 Jan 2;20(1):97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070

Author

McCargo, Duncan ; Senaratne, Dishani. / Victor's memory : Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective. In: Conflict, Security & Development. 2020 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 97-113.

Bibtex

@article{c4ceeebf114d4f358c5fe75c0e45b7d7,
title = "Victor's memory: Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective",
abstract = "How are victims of civil wars and conflicts remembered in the context of an illiberal peace? When a violent conflict is ended by the use of overwhelming state force, without benefit of a political process, the victors may seek to control the ways in which the violence is memorialised; while in a war where the insurgents remain in the shadows, public recognition of their losses may be impossible. Using Thailand as a comparison, this study compares the configuration of conflict memorialisation in Sri Lanka, focusing on two Tamil communities where Catholic priests played important roles: Vankalei and Mullivaikkal. In both cases, the Sri Lankan military saw memorialisation as a threat to national narratives about the rights and wrongs of the conflict. Yet in neither case have local people addressed the human rights abuses committed by the LTTE: their narratives emphasise victimhood and evade discussion of agency. Memorials dedicated to those who perished during civil conflicts are likely to be one-sided. Accordingly, the paper argues that an illiberal peace poses particular challenges for historical memory and memorialisation",
keywords = "Sri Lanka, Thailand, memorialisation, conflict, memory, illiberal peace",
author = "Duncan McCargo and Dishani Senaratne",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "97--113",
journal = "Conflict, Security & Development",
issn = "1467-8802",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Victor's memory

T2 - Sri Lanka's post-war memoryscape in comparative perspective

AU - McCargo, Duncan

AU - Senaratne, Dishani

PY - 2020/1/2

Y1 - 2020/1/2

N2 - How are victims of civil wars and conflicts remembered in the context of an illiberal peace? When a violent conflict is ended by the use of overwhelming state force, without benefit of a political process, the victors may seek to control the ways in which the violence is memorialised; while in a war where the insurgents remain in the shadows, public recognition of their losses may be impossible. Using Thailand as a comparison, this study compares the configuration of conflict memorialisation in Sri Lanka, focusing on two Tamil communities where Catholic priests played important roles: Vankalei and Mullivaikkal. In both cases, the Sri Lankan military saw memorialisation as a threat to national narratives about the rights and wrongs of the conflict. Yet in neither case have local people addressed the human rights abuses committed by the LTTE: their narratives emphasise victimhood and evade discussion of agency. Memorials dedicated to those who perished during civil conflicts are likely to be one-sided. Accordingly, the paper argues that an illiberal peace poses particular challenges for historical memory and memorialisation

AB - How are victims of civil wars and conflicts remembered in the context of an illiberal peace? When a violent conflict is ended by the use of overwhelming state force, without benefit of a political process, the victors may seek to control the ways in which the violence is memorialised; while in a war where the insurgents remain in the shadows, public recognition of their losses may be impossible. Using Thailand as a comparison, this study compares the configuration of conflict memorialisation in Sri Lanka, focusing on two Tamil communities where Catholic priests played important roles: Vankalei and Mullivaikkal. In both cases, the Sri Lankan military saw memorialisation as a threat to national narratives about the rights and wrongs of the conflict. Yet in neither case have local people addressed the human rights abuses committed by the LTTE: their narratives emphasise victimhood and evade discussion of agency. Memorials dedicated to those who perished during civil conflicts are likely to be one-sided. Accordingly, the paper argues that an illiberal peace poses particular challenges for historical memory and memorialisation

KW - Sri Lanka

KW - Thailand

KW - memorialisation

KW - conflict

KW - memory

KW - illiberal peace

U2 - 10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070

DO - 10.1080/14678802.2019.1705070

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 97

EP - 113

JO - Conflict, Security & Development

JF - Conflict, Security & Development

SN - 1467-8802

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 243546246