Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World : Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power. / Rosamond, Ben.

In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 133-148.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Rosamond, B 2014, 'Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power', British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12013

APA

Rosamond, B. (2014). Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12013

Vancouver

Rosamond B. Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power. British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2014 Jan;16(1):133-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12013

Author

Rosamond, Ben. / Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World : Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power. In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 133-148.

Bibtex

@article{a4e650c5c805477e87c46ac5979a522c,
title = "Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World: Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power",
abstract = "This article—a sympathetic critique of the literature on {\textquoteleft}Normative Power Europe'—observes that the rationales for EU external action, while understandable in terms of the concept of {\textquoteleft}normative power{\textquoteright}, emerge from a variety of overlapping and potentially contradictory liberal arguments. For the purposes of the argument, these liberalisms are organised into three ideal types: market liberalism, the pursuit of peace through liberal means and the ethic of cosmopolitan duty. The article suggests that while it is possible to associate different domains of EU external action with different varieties of liberal discourse, it is often more appropriate to see these policy domains as sites of struggle, negotiation and (perhaps) reconciliation between competing liberal projects.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, European Union, normative power, liberalism, ethics",
author = "Ben Rosamond",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/1467-856X.12013",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "133--148",
journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",
issn = "1369-1481",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three Ways of Speaking Europe to the World

T2 - Markets, Peace, Cosmopolitan Duty and the EU's Normative Power

AU - Rosamond, Ben

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This article—a sympathetic critique of the literature on ‘Normative Power Europe'—observes that the rationales for EU external action, while understandable in terms of the concept of ‘normative power’, emerge from a variety of overlapping and potentially contradictory liberal arguments. For the purposes of the argument, these liberalisms are organised into three ideal types: market liberalism, the pursuit of peace through liberal means and the ethic of cosmopolitan duty. The article suggests that while it is possible to associate different domains of EU external action with different varieties of liberal discourse, it is often more appropriate to see these policy domains as sites of struggle, negotiation and (perhaps) reconciliation between competing liberal projects.

AB - This article—a sympathetic critique of the literature on ‘Normative Power Europe'—observes that the rationales for EU external action, while understandable in terms of the concept of ‘normative power’, emerge from a variety of overlapping and potentially contradictory liberal arguments. For the purposes of the argument, these liberalisms are organised into three ideal types: market liberalism, the pursuit of peace through liberal means and the ethic of cosmopolitan duty. The article suggests that while it is possible to associate different domains of EU external action with different varieties of liberal discourse, it is often more appropriate to see these policy domains as sites of struggle, negotiation and (perhaps) reconciliation between competing liberal projects.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - European Union

KW - normative power

KW - liberalism

KW - ethics

U2 - 10.1111/1467-856X.12013

DO - 10.1111/1467-856X.12013

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 133

EP - 148

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

SN - 1369-1481

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 43242502