The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research

Standard

The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy. / Rostbøll, Christian Fogh.

2008. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research

Harvard

Rostbøll, CF 2008, 'The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy', Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, United States, 28/08/2008 - 31/08/2008.

APA

Rostbøll, C. F. (2008). The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, United States.

Vancouver

Rostbøll CF. The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy. 2008. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, United States.

Author

Rostbøll, Christian Fogh. / The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, United States.31 p.

Bibtex

@conference{c73a77d07a6b11dd81b0000ea68e967b,
title = "The Use and Abuse of {"}Universal Values{"} in the Danish Cartoon Controversy",
abstract = "During the Danish cartoon controversy in 2005-2006 appeals to universal liberal values were often made in ways that marginalized Muslims. An analysis of the controversy shows that referring to {"}universal values{"} can be exclusionary when dominant actors fail to distinguish their own culture's embodiment of these values from the more abstract ideas. To avoid self-contradiction, liberal principles and constitutional norms should not be seen as incontestable aspects of democracy but rather as subject to recursive democratic justification and revision by everyone subject to them. Newcomers should be able to contribute their specific perspectives in this process of democratically reinterpreting and perfecting the understanding of universalistic norms and thereby make them fit better to those to whom they apply and to make them theirs, too. In this way the norms are not made cultureless but they are separated from one specific culture and made the product of the meeting of members with different cultural backgrounds.",
author = "Rostb{\o}ll, {Christian Fogh}",
note = "Sider: 1-31; null ; Conference date: 28-08-2008 Through 31-08-2008",
year = "2008",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - The Use and Abuse of "Universal Values" in the Danish Cartoon Controversy

AU - Rostbøll, Christian Fogh

N1 - Sider: 1-31

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - During the Danish cartoon controversy in 2005-2006 appeals to universal liberal values were often made in ways that marginalized Muslims. An analysis of the controversy shows that referring to "universal values" can be exclusionary when dominant actors fail to distinguish their own culture's embodiment of these values from the more abstract ideas. To avoid self-contradiction, liberal principles and constitutional norms should not be seen as incontestable aspects of democracy but rather as subject to recursive democratic justification and revision by everyone subject to them. Newcomers should be able to contribute their specific perspectives in this process of democratically reinterpreting and perfecting the understanding of universalistic norms and thereby make them fit better to those to whom they apply and to make them theirs, too. In this way the norms are not made cultureless but they are separated from one specific culture and made the product of the meeting of members with different cultural backgrounds.

AB - During the Danish cartoon controversy in 2005-2006 appeals to universal liberal values were often made in ways that marginalized Muslims. An analysis of the controversy shows that referring to "universal values" can be exclusionary when dominant actors fail to distinguish their own culture's embodiment of these values from the more abstract ideas. To avoid self-contradiction, liberal principles and constitutional norms should not be seen as incontestable aspects of democracy but rather as subject to recursive democratic justification and revision by everyone subject to them. Newcomers should be able to contribute their specific perspectives in this process of democratically reinterpreting and perfecting the understanding of universalistic norms and thereby make them fit better to those to whom they apply and to make them theirs, too. In this way the norms are not made cultureless but they are separated from one specific culture and made the product of the meeting of members with different cultural backgrounds.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 28 August 2008 through 31 August 2008

ER -

ID: 5869896