The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The Evidence Movement : The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices. / Hansen, Hanne Foss; Rieper, Olaf.

In: Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009, p. 141-163.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hansen, HF & Rieper, O 2009, 'The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices', Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008101968

APA

Hansen, H. F., & Rieper, O. (2009). The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 15(2), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008101968

Vancouver

Hansen HF, Rieper O. The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 2009;15(2):141-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008101968

Author

Hansen, Hanne Foss ; Rieper, Olaf. / The Evidence Movement : The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices. In: Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 141-163.

Bibtex

@article{16864d80330f11de87b8000ea68e967b,
title = "The Evidence Movement: The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices",
abstract = "The evidence movement and the idea of systematic reviews, defined as summaries of the results of already existing evaluation and research projects, have gained considerable support in recent years as many international as well as national evidence-producing organizations have been established. This article analyses how the idea is practised in the areas of health, social welfare and education and shows that evidence-producing organizations work differently. Some subscribe to the hierarchy of evidence, others to a typology of evidence. The consequences of these variations are discussed. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, evidence movement, review practice, systematic reviews",
author = "Hansen, {Hanne Foss} and Olaf Rieper",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/1356389008101968",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "141--163",
journal = "Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice",
issn = "1356-3890",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Evidence Movement

T2 - The Development and Consequences of Methodologies in Review Practices

AU - Hansen, Hanne Foss

AU - Rieper, Olaf

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The evidence movement and the idea of systematic reviews, defined as summaries of the results of already existing evaluation and research projects, have gained considerable support in recent years as many international as well as national evidence-producing organizations have been established. This article analyses how the idea is practised in the areas of health, social welfare and education and shows that evidence-producing organizations work differently. Some subscribe to the hierarchy of evidence, others to a typology of evidence. The consequences of these variations are discussed.

AB - The evidence movement and the idea of systematic reviews, defined as summaries of the results of already existing evaluation and research projects, have gained considerable support in recent years as many international as well as national evidence-producing organizations have been established. This article analyses how the idea is practised in the areas of health, social welfare and education and shows that evidence-producing organizations work differently. Some subscribe to the hierarchy of evidence, others to a typology of evidence. The consequences of these variations are discussed.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - evidence movement

KW - review practice

KW - systematic reviews

U2 - 10.1177/1356389008101968

DO - 10.1177/1356389008101968

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 141

EP - 163

JO - Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice

JF - Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice

SN - 1356-3890

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 12050411