The challenge of liminality for international relations theory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Standard

The challenge of liminality for international relations theory. / Mälksoo, M.

Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. ed. Oxford : Berghahn Books, 2015.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Mälksoo, M 2015, The challenge of liminality for international relations theory. in Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality edn, Berghahn Books, Oxford. <http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=HorvathBreaking>

APA

Mälksoo, M. (2015). The challenge of liminality for international relations theory. In Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality (Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality ed.). Berghahn Books. http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=HorvathBreaking

Vancouver

Mälksoo M. The challenge of liminality for international relations theory. In Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality ed. Oxford: Berghahn Books. 2015

Author

Mälksoo, M. / The challenge of liminality for international relations theory. Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality. ed. Oxford : Berghahn Books, 2015.

Bibtex

@inbook{d9685116678d4811b98e3503d1688f68,
title = "The challenge of liminality for international relations theory",
abstract = "The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through {\textquoteleft}a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state{\textquoteright}. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the {\textquoteleft}liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial{\textquoteright}. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, liminality, international relations theory, political anthropology",
author = "M. M{\"a}lksoo",
note = "M{\"a}lksoo, Maria (2015). The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory. In: Horvath, Agnes, Bj{\o}rn Thomassen and Harald Wydra (Ed.). Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality (226−244). New York and Oxford: Berghahn.",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78238-766-4 ",
booktitle = "Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality",
publisher = "Berghahn Books",
edition = "Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - The challenge of liminality for international relations theory

AU - Mälksoo, M.

N1 - Mälksoo, Maria (2015). The Challenge of Liminality for International Relations Theory. In: Horvath, Agnes, Bjørn Thomassen and Harald Wydra (Ed.). Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality (226−244). New York and Oxford: Berghahn.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through ‘a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state’. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the ‘liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial’. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.

AB - The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through ‘a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state’. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the ‘liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial’. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - liminality

KW - international relations theory

KW - political anthropology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84940704667&partnerID=MN8TOARS

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-1-78238-766-4

BT - Breaking Boundaries: Varieties of Liminality

PB - Berghahn Books

CY - Oxford

ER -

ID: 284633709