The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory. / MÄlksoo, M.

In: Review of International Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2012, p. 481-494.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

MÄlksoo, M 2012, 'The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory', Review of International Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000829

APA

MÄlksoo, M. (2012). The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory. Review of International Studies, 38(2), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000829

Vancouver

MÄlksoo M. The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory. Review of International Studies. 2012;38(2):481-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000829

Author

MÄlksoo, M. / The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory. In: Review of International Studies. 2012 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 481-494.

Bibtex

@article{cf2508ea416448bb99973643358e9166,
title = "The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory",
abstract = "The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through {\textquoteleft}a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state{\textquoteright}. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the {\textquoteleft}liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial{\textquoteright}. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, international relations theory, liminality, Victor Turner, Arnold van Gennep",
author = "M. M{\"A}lksoo",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1017/S0260210511000829",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "481--494",
journal = "Review of International Studies",
issn = "0260-2105",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The challenge of liminality for International Relations theory

AU - MÄlksoo, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through ‘a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state’. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the ‘liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial’. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.

AB - The concept of liminality favours a broad interpretation, lending itself easily to disciplinary contexts outside of the original framework of cultural anthropology. Developed by Arnold van Gennep and Victor Turner by exploring the rites of passage, liminality points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered. The liminal state is a central phase in all social and cultural transitions as it marks the passage of the subject through ‘a cultural realm that has few or none of the attributes of the past or coming state’. It is thus a realm of great ambiguity, since the ‘liminal entities are neither here nor there; they are betwixt and between the positions assigned and arrayed by law, custom, convention, and ceremonial’. Yet, as a threshold situation, liminality is also a vital moment of creativity, a potential platform for renewing the societal make-up.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - international relations theory

KW - liminality

KW - Victor Turner

KW - Arnold van Gennep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84860514352&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1017/S0260210511000829

DO - 10.1017/S0260210511000829

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 481

EP - 494

JO - Review of International Studies

JF - Review of International Studies

SN - 0260-2105

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 284506746