Representing the People: Laclau as a Theorist of Representation
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Representing the People : Laclau as a Theorist of Representation. / Thomassen, Lasse.
In: New Political Science, Vol. 41, No. 2, 10, 2019, p. 329-344.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Representing the People
T2 - Laclau as a Theorist of Representation
AU - Thomassen, Lasse
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Going beyond conventional conceptions of political representation, Ernesto Laclau takes representation to be a general category and not just limited to formal political institutions, and he takes representation to be performative in that it also brings about what is represented. This article examines the implications of this conceptualization of representation for Laclau’s theory of populism. Laclau takes populism to be exemplary of his conception of representation because populism is a discourse that brings into being what it claims to represent: the people. This is important for current debates about populism and the crisis of democratic institutions, whether domestic or international. I show how our conceptions of representation inform how we think about populism and liberal democracy, and specifically about populism as a threat to liberal democracy at the domestic or global level. I show this in the context of a reading of Jan-Werner Müller’s influential critique of populism.
AB - Going beyond conventional conceptions of political representation, Ernesto Laclau takes representation to be a general category and not just limited to formal political institutions, and he takes representation to be performative in that it also brings about what is represented. This article examines the implications of this conceptualization of representation for Laclau’s theory of populism. Laclau takes populism to be exemplary of his conception of representation because populism is a discourse that brings into being what it claims to represent: the people. This is important for current debates about populism and the crisis of democratic institutions, whether domestic or international. I show how our conceptions of representation inform how we think about populism and liberal democracy, and specifically about populism as a threat to liberal democracy at the domestic or global level. I show this in the context of a reading of Jan-Werner Müller’s influential critique of populism.
U2 - 10.1080/07393148.2019.1596687
DO - 10.1080/07393148.2019.1596687
M3 - Journal article
VL - 41
SP - 329
EP - 344
JO - New Political Science
JF - New Political Science
SN - 0739-3148
IS - 2
M1 - 10
ER -
ID: 225998176