More than funders: The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

More than funders : The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance. / Blackwatters, Jeffrey E.; Betsill, Michele; Enrici, Ash; Le Cornu, Elodie; Basurto, Xavier; Gruby, Rebecca L.

In: Conservation Science and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 5, e12829, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Blackwatters, JE, Betsill, M, Enrici, A, Le Cornu, E, Basurto, X & Gruby, RL 2023, 'More than funders: The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance', Conservation Science and Practice, vol. 5, no. 5, e12829. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12829

APA

Blackwatters, J. E., Betsill, M., Enrici, A., Le Cornu, E., Basurto, X., & Gruby, R. L. (2023). More than funders: The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(5), [e12829]. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12829

Vancouver

Blackwatters JE, Betsill M, Enrici A, Le Cornu E, Basurto X, Gruby RL. More than funders: The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance. Conservation Science and Practice. 2023;5(5). e12829. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12829

Author

Blackwatters, Jeffrey E. ; Betsill, Michele ; Enrici, Ash ; Le Cornu, Elodie ; Basurto, Xavier ; Gruby, Rebecca L. / More than funders : The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance. In: Conservation Science and Practice. 2023 ; Vol. 5, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{da380b587fa745b68d4c887c8277e132,
title = "More than funders: The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance",
abstract = "Environmental governance scholars have overlooked philanthropic foundations as influential non-state actors. This omission, along with the continued growth in funding from private foundations for conservation issues, presents important questions about what foundations do in governance spaces. To address this gap, we examine The David and Lucile Packard Foundation's involvement in Fiji and Palau in the context of the Foundation's “Western Pacific Program”—a series of coastal and marine-related investments made from 1998 to 2020. We describe and analyze six governance roles that the Packard Foundation contributed to: funding, influencing agendas, capacity-building, convening and coordinating, facilitating knowledge, and rule-making and regulation. In documenting the Packard Foundation's governance roles, we provide scholars and practitioners a conceptual framework to more systematically and strategically think about foundations as more than funders. This research helps move the conversation around conservation philanthropy beyond binary conceptions of “good” versus “bad,” and, instead, toward deeper considerations about what foundations currently do within governance systems, how they engage with diverse practitioners, as well as what they can and should do to advance conservation goals.",
keywords = "agency, conservation, environmental governance, non-state actors, philanthropy",
author = "Blackwatters, {Jeffrey E.} and Michele Betsill and Ash Enrici and {Le Cornu}, Elodie and Xavier Basurto and Gruby, {Rebecca L.}",
note = "Funding Information: The Packard Foundation did not enforce rules or regulations directly. Rather, the work of its grantees – supported by Foundation grants for capacity‐building, knowledge generation, policy analysis and reform, etc. – influenced marine conservation rules, regulations, and regulatory bodies in Fiji and Palau. Funding Information: We thank all research participants, whose contributions to this work made it possible. This research was supported with grants from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (grant numbers 2017‐66579 and 2018‐68274) and Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies (grant number 1810‐05974). This research is approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Review Board for the protection of human subjects (protocol 18‐7869H). We thank past and current members of our Research Advisory Committee: Heather D′Agnes, Kristin Goss, King Sam, Aliti Vunisea, and Suliana Siwatibau, for their guidance throughout all stages of our research. Lastly, we want to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/csp2.12829",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Conservation Science and Practice",
issn = "2578-4854",
publisher = "Wiley Online",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - More than funders

T2 - The roles of philanthropic foundations in marine conservation governance

AU - Blackwatters, Jeffrey E.

AU - Betsill, Michele

AU - Enrici, Ash

AU - Le Cornu, Elodie

AU - Basurto, Xavier

AU - Gruby, Rebecca L.

N1 - Funding Information: The Packard Foundation did not enforce rules or regulations directly. Rather, the work of its grantees – supported by Foundation grants for capacity‐building, knowledge generation, policy analysis and reform, etc. – influenced marine conservation rules, regulations, and regulatory bodies in Fiji and Palau. Funding Information: We thank all research participants, whose contributions to this work made it possible. This research was supported with grants from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (grant numbers 2017‐66579 and 2018‐68274) and Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies (grant number 1810‐05974). This research is approved by the Colorado State University Institutional Review Board for the protection of human subjects (protocol 18‐7869H). We thank past and current members of our Research Advisory Committee: Heather D′Agnes, Kristin Goss, King Sam, Aliti Vunisea, and Suliana Siwatibau, for their guidance throughout all stages of our research. Lastly, we want to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Environmental governance scholars have overlooked philanthropic foundations as influential non-state actors. This omission, along with the continued growth in funding from private foundations for conservation issues, presents important questions about what foundations do in governance spaces. To address this gap, we examine The David and Lucile Packard Foundation's involvement in Fiji and Palau in the context of the Foundation's “Western Pacific Program”—a series of coastal and marine-related investments made from 1998 to 2020. We describe and analyze six governance roles that the Packard Foundation contributed to: funding, influencing agendas, capacity-building, convening and coordinating, facilitating knowledge, and rule-making and regulation. In documenting the Packard Foundation's governance roles, we provide scholars and practitioners a conceptual framework to more systematically and strategically think about foundations as more than funders. This research helps move the conversation around conservation philanthropy beyond binary conceptions of “good” versus “bad,” and, instead, toward deeper considerations about what foundations currently do within governance systems, how they engage with diverse practitioners, as well as what they can and should do to advance conservation goals.

AB - Environmental governance scholars have overlooked philanthropic foundations as influential non-state actors. This omission, along with the continued growth in funding from private foundations for conservation issues, presents important questions about what foundations do in governance spaces. To address this gap, we examine The David and Lucile Packard Foundation's involvement in Fiji and Palau in the context of the Foundation's “Western Pacific Program”—a series of coastal and marine-related investments made from 1998 to 2020. We describe and analyze six governance roles that the Packard Foundation contributed to: funding, influencing agendas, capacity-building, convening and coordinating, facilitating knowledge, and rule-making and regulation. In documenting the Packard Foundation's governance roles, we provide scholars and practitioners a conceptual framework to more systematically and strategically think about foundations as more than funders. This research helps move the conversation around conservation philanthropy beyond binary conceptions of “good” versus “bad,” and, instead, toward deeper considerations about what foundations currently do within governance systems, how they engage with diverse practitioners, as well as what they can and should do to advance conservation goals.

KW - agency

KW - conservation

KW - environmental governance

KW - non-state actors

KW - philanthropy

U2 - 10.1111/csp2.12829

DO - 10.1111/csp2.12829

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85140213475

VL - 5

JO - Conservation Science and Practice

JF - Conservation Science and Practice

SN - 2578-4854

IS - 5

M1 - e12829

ER -

ID: 334651238