Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Liminality in Language Use : Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective. / Murakami, Kyoko.

In: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, Vol. 44, 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x, 2010, p. 30-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Murakami, K 2010, 'Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective', Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, vol. 44, 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x, pp. 30-38.

APA

Murakami, K. (2010). Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 44, 30-38. [10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x].

Vancouver

Murakami K. Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 2010;44:30-38. 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x.

Author

Murakami, Kyoko. / Liminality in Language Use : Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective. In: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 2010 ; Vol. 44. pp. 30-38.

Bibtex

@article{781c9896508b4501bf038616551c1090,
title = "Liminality in Language Use: Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective",
abstract = "This essay traces my engagement with Mich{\`e}le Grossen{\textquoteright}s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological andBehavioral Science, 1–22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self ininteraction. Firstly I draw on Turner{\textquoteright}s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Interaction analysis, liminality, dialogical perspective",
author = "Kyoko Murakami",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "30--38",
journal = "Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science",
issn = "1932-4502",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liminality in Language Use

T2 - Some Thoughts on Interactional Analysis from a Dialogical Perspective

AU - Murakami, Kyoko

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological andBehavioral Science, 1–22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self ininteraction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.

AB - This essay traces my engagement with Michèle Grossen’s ideas of a dialogical perspective on interaction analysis (Grossen Integrative Psychological andBehavioral Science, 1–22, 2009) and highlights a process account of self ininteraction. Firstly I draw on Turner’s concept of liminality with respect to the transformative, temporal significance in interaction. Secondly I explored further the conversation analytic concepts such as formulation and reformulation as a viable analytical tool for a dialogical perspective. Lastly, I addressed the issue of interaction in institutional settings, in particular with interactional asymmetries of interaction, whilst relativising the I-position dialogical perspective. I explore insights from social anthropology as well as revisiting conversation analysis and discursive psychology, concluding that a promising direction would be sought through a cross-fertilisation between dialogism and other sibling perspectives concerning language use, communication, social action and discourse- and narrative-based analyses.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Interaction analysis

KW - liminality

KW - dialogical perspective

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 30

EP - 38

JO - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science

JF - Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science

SN - 1932-4502

M1 - 10.1007/s12124-010-9115-x

ER -

ID: 147176237