Intelligence expertise in the age of information sharing: public-private “collection” and its challenges to democratic control and accountability
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Intelligence expertise in the age of information sharing : public-private “collection” and its challenges to democratic control and accountability. / Petersen, Karen Lund; Tjalve, Vibeke Schou.
In: Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2018, p. 21-35.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intelligence expertise in the age of information sharing
T2 - public-private “collection” and its challenges to democratic control and accountability
AU - Petersen, Karen Lund
AU - Tjalve, Vibeke Schou
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The emergence of a more elusive and uncertain threat environment has transformed the nature of intelligence, increasing its reliance on civil society partners. Once the work of an insular and carefully select few, intelligence production is now a networked, partially open and extensively public–private enterprise. Most poignantly, new practices of public–private ‘collection’ face Western intelligence services with novel questions about control and accountability – questions to which the services have responded with hopes that by standardizing ‘methodologies’, central command may be retained. Suggesting a more complex picture, this article argues that ‘managing uncertainty’ imply forms of interpretation and choices which cannot be pre-empted by rule-regulation: more than Weber’s ideal of the procedural and rule-bound, it may be his (once central, yet largely marginalized) emphasis on institutional and individual capacities for critical ‘judgment’ that is of relevance today.
AB - The emergence of a more elusive and uncertain threat environment has transformed the nature of intelligence, increasing its reliance on civil society partners. Once the work of an insular and carefully select few, intelligence production is now a networked, partially open and extensively public–private enterprise. Most poignantly, new practices of public–private ‘collection’ face Western intelligence services with novel questions about control and accountability – questions to which the services have responded with hopes that by standardizing ‘methodologies’, central command may be retained. Suggesting a more complex picture, this article argues that ‘managing uncertainty’ imply forms of interpretation and choices which cannot be pre-empted by rule-regulation: more than Weber’s ideal of the procedural and rule-bound, it may be his (once central, yet largely marginalized) emphasis on institutional and individual capacities for critical ‘judgment’ that is of relevance today.
U2 - 10.1080/02684527.2017.1316956
DO - 10.1080/02684527.2017.1316956
M3 - Journal article
VL - 33
SP - 21
EP - 35
JO - Intelligence and National Security
JF - Intelligence and National Security
SN - 0268-4527
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 174860250