How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not): Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not) : Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions. / Bramsen, Isabel.

In: Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 3, 01.2018, p. 61-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bramsen, I 2018, 'How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not): Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions', Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research, vol. 43, no. 1, 3, pp. 61-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.12274

APA

Bramsen, I. (2018). How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not): Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions. Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research, 43(1), 61-89. [3]. https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.12274

Vancouver

Bramsen I. How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not): Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions. Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research. 2018 Jan;43(1):61-89. 3. https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.12274

Author

Bramsen, Isabel. / How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not) : Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions. In: Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research. 2018 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 61-89.

Bibtex

@article{70aef779a9d5486ab308c5f8bfa3d6d0,
title = "How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not): Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions",
abstract = "The article analyzes the micro‐sociological dynamics of civil resistance in the uprisings in Bahrain and Tunisia (2010‐11). It argues that the Tunisian uprising succeeded because regime repression generated solidarity and unity among diverse groups in society, while the regime increasingly suffered from miscommunication, mistrust, and increasing disobedience. In Bahrain, the movement initially enjoyed a high degree of unity and solidarity mobilizing against regime atrocities, but as the regime allowed protesters to demonstrate with little interference for a month, internal divisions emerged. Whereas Tunisian protesters launched a united escalation at a time of opponent weakness, factions of Bahraini activists escalated at a time of increasing division in the movement and society as a whole which both provoked and enabled a crackdown by the regime. Conclusively, success or failure of an uprising depends on a movement and a regime's ability to maintain unity respectively, as well as the timing of escalatory actions.",
author = "Isabel Bramsen",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1111/pech.12274",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "61--89",
journal = "Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Civil Resistance Succeeds (or Not)

T2 - Micro-dynamics of Unity, Timing, and Escalatory Actions

AU - Bramsen, Isabel

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - The article analyzes the micro‐sociological dynamics of civil resistance in the uprisings in Bahrain and Tunisia (2010‐11). It argues that the Tunisian uprising succeeded because regime repression generated solidarity and unity among diverse groups in society, while the regime increasingly suffered from miscommunication, mistrust, and increasing disobedience. In Bahrain, the movement initially enjoyed a high degree of unity and solidarity mobilizing against regime atrocities, but as the regime allowed protesters to demonstrate with little interference for a month, internal divisions emerged. Whereas Tunisian protesters launched a united escalation at a time of opponent weakness, factions of Bahraini activists escalated at a time of increasing division in the movement and society as a whole which both provoked and enabled a crackdown by the regime. Conclusively, success or failure of an uprising depends on a movement and a regime's ability to maintain unity respectively, as well as the timing of escalatory actions.

AB - The article analyzes the micro‐sociological dynamics of civil resistance in the uprisings in Bahrain and Tunisia (2010‐11). It argues that the Tunisian uprising succeeded because regime repression generated solidarity and unity among diverse groups in society, while the regime increasingly suffered from miscommunication, mistrust, and increasing disobedience. In Bahrain, the movement initially enjoyed a high degree of unity and solidarity mobilizing against regime atrocities, but as the regime allowed protesters to demonstrate with little interference for a month, internal divisions emerged. Whereas Tunisian protesters launched a united escalation at a time of opponent weakness, factions of Bahraini activists escalated at a time of increasing division in the movement and society as a whole which both provoked and enabled a crackdown by the regime. Conclusively, success or failure of an uprising depends on a movement and a regime's ability to maintain unity respectively, as well as the timing of escalatory actions.

U2 - 10.1111/pech.12274

DO - 10.1111/pech.12274

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 61

EP - 89

JO - Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research

JF - Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -

ID: 182507872