Galeotti on recognition as inclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Galeotti on recognition as inclusion. / Lægaard, Sune.

In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2008, p. 291-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lægaard, S 2008, 'Galeotti on recognition as inclusion', Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363

APA

Lægaard, S. (2008). Galeotti on recognition as inclusion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(3), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363

Vancouver

Lægaard S. Galeotti on recognition as inclusion. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2008;11(3):291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363

Author

Lægaard, Sune. / Galeotti on recognition as inclusion. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 291-314.

Bibtex

@article{395ec8b0684811dd8d9f000ea68e967b,
title = "Galeotti on recognition as inclusion",
abstract = "Anna Elisabetta Galeotti's theory of 'toleration as recognition' has been criticised by Peter Jones for being conceptually incoherent, since liberal toleration presupposes a negative attitude to differences, whereas multicultural recognition requires positive affirmation hereof. The paper spells out Galeotti's justification for recognition as a requirement of liberal justice in detail and asks in what sense the policies supported by Galeotti are policies of recognition. It is argued that Jones misrepresents Galeotti's theory, insofar as this sense of recognition actually is compatible with liberal toleration. This does not prove Jones's criticism to be wrong, since the justification may have implications unacknowledged by Galeotti, which might be liberally problematic. The paper considers this problem and possible ways of responding to it, but concludes that Galeotti's theory is incomplete in respects that need to be filled out in order to secure compatibility with liberalism, and that this may prove problematic. Keywords: liberalism; multiculturalism; recognition; toleration ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, liberalisme, multikulturalisme, anerkendelse, tolerance, liberalism, multiculturalism, recognition, toleration",
author = "Sune L{\ae}gaard",
note = "Paper id:: 10.1080/13698230802276363",
year = "2008",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "291--314",
journal = "Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy",
issn = "1369-8230",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Galeotti on recognition as inclusion

AU - Lægaard, Sune

N1 - Paper id:: 10.1080/13698230802276363

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Anna Elisabetta Galeotti's theory of 'toleration as recognition' has been criticised by Peter Jones for being conceptually incoherent, since liberal toleration presupposes a negative attitude to differences, whereas multicultural recognition requires positive affirmation hereof. The paper spells out Galeotti's justification for recognition as a requirement of liberal justice in detail and asks in what sense the policies supported by Galeotti are policies of recognition. It is argued that Jones misrepresents Galeotti's theory, insofar as this sense of recognition actually is compatible with liberal toleration. This does not prove Jones's criticism to be wrong, since the justification may have implications unacknowledged by Galeotti, which might be liberally problematic. The paper considers this problem and possible ways of responding to it, but concludes that Galeotti's theory is incomplete in respects that need to be filled out in order to secure compatibility with liberalism, and that this may prove problematic. Keywords: liberalism; multiculturalism; recognition; toleration

AB - Anna Elisabetta Galeotti's theory of 'toleration as recognition' has been criticised by Peter Jones for being conceptually incoherent, since liberal toleration presupposes a negative attitude to differences, whereas multicultural recognition requires positive affirmation hereof. The paper spells out Galeotti's justification for recognition as a requirement of liberal justice in detail and asks in what sense the policies supported by Galeotti are policies of recognition. It is argued that Jones misrepresents Galeotti's theory, insofar as this sense of recognition actually is compatible with liberal toleration. This does not prove Jones's criticism to be wrong, since the justification may have implications unacknowledged by Galeotti, which might be liberally problematic. The paper considers this problem and possible ways of responding to it, but concludes that Galeotti's theory is incomplete in respects that need to be filled out in order to secure compatibility with liberalism, and that this may prove problematic. Keywords: liberalism; multiculturalism; recognition; toleration

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - liberalisme

KW - multikulturalisme

KW - anerkendelse

KW - tolerance

KW - liberalism

KW - multiculturalism

KW - recognition

KW - toleration

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230802276363

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 291

EP - 314

JO - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

JF - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

SN - 1369-8230

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 5466833