Cybersecurity and the politics of knowledge production: towards a reflexive practice
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Cybersecurity and the politics of knowledge production : towards a reflexive practice. / Cristiano, Fabio; Kurowsk, Xymena ; Stevens, Tim; Hurel, Louise Marie; Fouad, Noran Shafik; Shires, James; Liebetrau, Tobias.
In: Journal of Cyber Policy, 02.01.2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cybersecurity and the politics of knowledge production
T2 - towards a reflexive practice
AU - Cristiano, Fabio
AU - Kurowsk, Xymena
AU - Stevens, Tim
AU - Hurel, Louise Marie
AU - Fouad, Noran Shafik
AU - Shires, James
AU - Liebetrau, Tobias
PY - 2024/1/2
Y1 - 2024/1/2
N2 - How does a reflexive scholarly practice matter for producing useful cybersecurity knowledge and policy? We argue that staking relevance without engaging in reflexivity diminishes the usefulness of knowledge produced both in academia and in policy. To advance a reflexive research agenda in cybersecurity, this forum offers a collective interrogation of the liminal positionality of the cybersecurity scholar. We examine the politics of ‘the making of’ cybersecurity expertise as knowledge practitioners who are located across and in between the diverse and overlapping fields of academia, diplomacy and policy. Cybersecurity expertise, and the practices of the cybersecurity epistemic community more broadly, rely heavily on the perceived applicability and actionability of knowledge outputs, on the practical dependency on policy practitioners regarding access,and thus on the continuous negotiation of hierarchies of knowledge. Participants in this forum reflect on their research practice of negotiating such dilemmas. Collectively, we draw on these contributions to identify obstacles and opportunitiestowards realising a reflexive research practice in cybersecurity.
AB - How does a reflexive scholarly practice matter for producing useful cybersecurity knowledge and policy? We argue that staking relevance without engaging in reflexivity diminishes the usefulness of knowledge produced both in academia and in policy. To advance a reflexive research agenda in cybersecurity, this forum offers a collective interrogation of the liminal positionality of the cybersecurity scholar. We examine the politics of ‘the making of’ cybersecurity expertise as knowledge practitioners who are located across and in between the diverse and overlapping fields of academia, diplomacy and policy. Cybersecurity expertise, and the practices of the cybersecurity epistemic community more broadly, rely heavily on the perceived applicability and actionability of knowledge outputs, on the practical dependency on policy practitioners regarding access,and thus on the continuous negotiation of hierarchies of knowledge. Participants in this forum reflect on their research practice of negotiating such dilemmas. Collectively, we draw on these contributions to identify obstacles and opportunitiestowards realising a reflexive research practice in cybersecurity.
U2 - 10.1080/23738871.2023.2287687
DO - 10.1080/23738871.2023.2287687
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
JO - Journal of Cyber Policy
JF - Journal of Cyber Policy
ER -
ID: 379301353