Concluding Discussion: The planetary is not the end of the international

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research

Standard

Concluding Discussion : The planetary is not the end of the international. / Corry, Olaf.

Nonhuman Nature and World Politics : Theory and Practice. ed. / Joana Pereira; André Saramago. Cham : Springer, 2020. p. 337-352 (Frontiers in International Relations).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research

Harvard

Corry, O 2020, Concluding Discussion: The planetary is not the end of the international. in J Pereira & A Saramago (eds), Nonhuman Nature and World Politics : Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham, Frontiers in International Relations, pp. 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4

APA

Corry, O. (2020). Concluding Discussion: The planetary is not the end of the international. In J. Pereira, & A. Saramago (Eds.), Nonhuman Nature and World Politics : Theory and Practice (pp. 337-352). Springer. Frontiers in International Relations https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4

Vancouver

Corry O. Concluding Discussion: The planetary is not the end of the international. In Pereira J, Saramago A, editors, Nonhuman Nature and World Politics : Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer. 2020. p. 337-352. (Frontiers in International Relations). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4

Author

Corry, Olaf. / Concluding Discussion : The planetary is not the end of the international. Nonhuman Nature and World Politics : Theory and Practice. editor / Joana Pereira ; André Saramago. Cham : Springer, 2020. pp. 337-352 (Frontiers in International Relations).

Bibtex

@inbook{21f0edbbb9d74782afc63f9ed0257f4d,
title = "Concluding Discussion: The planetary is not the end of the international",
abstract = "Drawing on chapters of this book as well as wider literatures, in this concluding chapter I first situate the relative invisibility of non-human nature in IR, pointing to the demise of geopolitics around the Second World War as part of a wider bifurcation of knowledge into “social” and “natural” sciences. Secondly, I argue that current attempts to take account of non-human nature have tended to bring with them globalist framings that underplay or even obscure the importance of the international. Thirdly, I outline an outlook that does not feature prominently in the rest of this book, but which might provide an additional way of further developing its goals, allowing a theorisation of society that has the non-human at its core to form the building block for a materialist theory of the international. The overall aim is to take stock of attempts to grasp how the metabolism between humans and non-human nature is itself multiple, intrinsically bound up with and marked by relations between societies—separate yet coexisting socio-ecological entities.",
author = "Olaf Corry",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4",
language = "English",
series = "Frontiers in International Relations",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "337--352",
editor = "Pereira, {Joana } and Andr{\'e} Saramago",
booktitle = "Nonhuman Nature and World Politics",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Concluding Discussion

T2 - The planetary is not the end of the international

AU - Corry, Olaf

PY - 2020/8/27

Y1 - 2020/8/27

N2 - Drawing on chapters of this book as well as wider literatures, in this concluding chapter I first situate the relative invisibility of non-human nature in IR, pointing to the demise of geopolitics around the Second World War as part of a wider bifurcation of knowledge into “social” and “natural” sciences. Secondly, I argue that current attempts to take account of non-human nature have tended to bring with them globalist framings that underplay or even obscure the importance of the international. Thirdly, I outline an outlook that does not feature prominently in the rest of this book, but which might provide an additional way of further developing its goals, allowing a theorisation of society that has the non-human at its core to form the building block for a materialist theory of the international. The overall aim is to take stock of attempts to grasp how the metabolism between humans and non-human nature is itself multiple, intrinsically bound up with and marked by relations between societies—separate yet coexisting socio-ecological entities.

AB - Drawing on chapters of this book as well as wider literatures, in this concluding chapter I first situate the relative invisibility of non-human nature in IR, pointing to the demise of geopolitics around the Second World War as part of a wider bifurcation of knowledge into “social” and “natural” sciences. Secondly, I argue that current attempts to take account of non-human nature have tended to bring with them globalist framings that underplay or even obscure the importance of the international. Thirdly, I outline an outlook that does not feature prominently in the rest of this book, but which might provide an additional way of further developing its goals, allowing a theorisation of society that has the non-human at its core to form the building block for a materialist theory of the international. The overall aim is to take stock of attempts to grasp how the metabolism between humans and non-human nature is itself multiple, intrinsically bound up with and marked by relations between societies—separate yet coexisting socio-ecological entities.

UR - https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030494957#aboutAuthors

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4

M3 - Book chapter

T3 - Frontiers in International Relations

SP - 337

EP - 352

BT - Nonhuman Nature and World Politics

A2 - Pereira, Joana

A2 - Saramago, André

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -

ID: 247507822