Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy. / Le Cornu, Elodie; Gruby, Rebecca L. L.; Blackwatters, Jeffrey E. E.; Enrici, Ash; Basurto, Xavier; Betsill, Michele.

In: Conservation Science and Practice, Vol. 5, e12868, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Le Cornu, E, Gruby, RLL, Blackwatters, JEE, Enrici, A, Basurto, X & Betsill, M 2023, 'Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy', Conservation Science and Practice, vol. 5, e12868. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12868

APA

Le Cornu, E., Gruby, R. L. L., Blackwatters, J. E. E., Enrici, A., Basurto, X., & Betsill, M. (2023). Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy. Conservation Science and Practice, 5, [e12868]. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12868

Vancouver

Le Cornu E, Gruby RLL, Blackwatters JEE, Enrici A, Basurto X, Betsill M. Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy. Conservation Science and Practice. 2023;5. e12868. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12868

Author

Le Cornu, Elodie ; Gruby, Rebecca L. L. ; Blackwatters, Jeffrey E. E. ; Enrici, Ash ; Basurto, Xavier ; Betsill, Michele. / Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy. In: Conservation Science and Practice. 2023 ; Vol. 5.

Bibtex

@article{f60707a09e6244d89122732258af8f50,
title = "Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy",
abstract = "Conservation philanthropy has grown significantly in the past decade. As the number of philanthropic-supported conservation initiatives increases, so too will the frequency of exits—the ending of funding relationships. A trend toward “strategic philanthropy,” where foundations fund time-limited grants, is already contributing to near-constant exits. We draw attention to exits as a critical and ubiquitous—yet understudied—part of conservation grantmaking processes that can have tremendous impacts on the people and places foundations invest in. This paper begins to address this research gap with the first empirical study of exit processes in the context of ocean conservation philanthropy. We draw on an analysis of interviews and a knowledge co-production workshop with donors representing 36 foundations investing in ocean conservation globally to: (1) develop a conceptual framework that broadens and clarifies definitions of exits and provides a common language to characterize exits along varied dimensions, and (2) derive best practices for exiting responsibly. This paper provides timely guidance for environmental philanthropy broadly, including the need to think about exits early and often as an integral part of the grantmaking strategy. Responsible giving must include responsible exits.",
keywords = "conservation philanthropy, donor exits, ocean conservation, philanthropic foundations, responsible exits",
author = "{Le Cornu}, Elodie and Gruby, {Rebecca L. L.} and Blackwatters, {Jeffrey E. E.} and Ash Enrici and Xavier Basurto and Michele Betsill",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1111/csp2.12868",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Conservation Science and Practice",
issn = "2578-4854",
publisher = "Wiley Online",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conceptualizing responsible exits in conservation philanthropy

AU - Le Cornu, Elodie

AU - Gruby, Rebecca L. L.

AU - Blackwatters, Jeffrey E. E.

AU - Enrici, Ash

AU - Basurto, Xavier

AU - Betsill, Michele

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Conservation philanthropy has grown significantly in the past decade. As the number of philanthropic-supported conservation initiatives increases, so too will the frequency of exits—the ending of funding relationships. A trend toward “strategic philanthropy,” where foundations fund time-limited grants, is already contributing to near-constant exits. We draw attention to exits as a critical and ubiquitous—yet understudied—part of conservation grantmaking processes that can have tremendous impacts on the people and places foundations invest in. This paper begins to address this research gap with the first empirical study of exit processes in the context of ocean conservation philanthropy. We draw on an analysis of interviews and a knowledge co-production workshop with donors representing 36 foundations investing in ocean conservation globally to: (1) develop a conceptual framework that broadens and clarifies definitions of exits and provides a common language to characterize exits along varied dimensions, and (2) derive best practices for exiting responsibly. This paper provides timely guidance for environmental philanthropy broadly, including the need to think about exits early and often as an integral part of the grantmaking strategy. Responsible giving must include responsible exits.

AB - Conservation philanthropy has grown significantly in the past decade. As the number of philanthropic-supported conservation initiatives increases, so too will the frequency of exits—the ending of funding relationships. A trend toward “strategic philanthropy,” where foundations fund time-limited grants, is already contributing to near-constant exits. We draw attention to exits as a critical and ubiquitous—yet understudied—part of conservation grantmaking processes that can have tremendous impacts on the people and places foundations invest in. This paper begins to address this research gap with the first empirical study of exit processes in the context of ocean conservation philanthropy. We draw on an analysis of interviews and a knowledge co-production workshop with donors representing 36 foundations investing in ocean conservation globally to: (1) develop a conceptual framework that broadens and clarifies definitions of exits and provides a common language to characterize exits along varied dimensions, and (2) derive best practices for exiting responsibly. This paper provides timely guidance for environmental philanthropy broadly, including the need to think about exits early and often as an integral part of the grantmaking strategy. Responsible giving must include responsible exits.

KW - conservation philanthropy

KW - donor exits

KW - ocean conservation

KW - philanthropic foundations

KW - responsible exits

U2 - 10.1111/csp2.12868

DO - 10.1111/csp2.12868

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

JO - Conservation Science and Practice

JF - Conservation Science and Practice

SN - 2578-4854

M1 - e12868

ER -

ID: 344365221