Coda: exploring defence planning in future research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Coda : exploring defence planning in future research. / Breitenbauch, Henrik; Jakobsson, André Ken.

In: Defence Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 03.07.2018, p. 391-394.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Breitenbauch, H & Jakobsson, AK 2018, 'Coda: exploring defence planning in future research', Defence Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 391-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447

APA

Breitenbauch, H., & Jakobsson, A. K. (2018). Coda: exploring defence planning in future research. Defence Studies, 18(3), 391-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447

Vancouver

Breitenbauch H, Jakobsson AK. Coda: exploring defence planning in future research. Defence Studies. 2018 Jul 3;18(3):391-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447

Author

Breitenbauch, Henrik ; Jakobsson, André Ken. / Coda : exploring defence planning in future research. In: Defence Studies. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 391-394.

Bibtex

@article{e3df89d31f4f41779cf6242b62e656a0,
title = "Coda: exploring defence planning in future research",
abstract = "Through the contributions of this special issue, defence planning emerges as a strategic fact with a significance of its own. Defence planning does not merely serve as a conduit for external forces, but instead appears as an independent or intermediate variable as well as a discrete arena for national security processing. In this conclusion, we return to the overall issue of defence planning as an object of study as proposed in the introduction. We identify three analytical dimensions inspired by the contributions which offer avenues for future research on defence planning. These are process versus change, the issue of national versus comparative or international dynamics, and finally hybrid or interface dynamics. It is, in other words, important to account for the roles defence planning may play with regard to affecting change in strategic affairs, to deepen our understanding of the dynamics of defence planning in central national cases such as the US as well as the international and comparative aspects of such dynamics, and finally it is important to analyse the characteristics and effects of defence planning in its wider political, administrative and strategic contexts.",
keywords = "defence organization, Defence planning, defence policy, strategic fact",
author = "Henrik Breitenbauch and Jakobsson, {Andr{\'e} Ken}",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "391--394",
journal = "Defence Studies",
issn = "1470-2436",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coda

T2 - exploring defence planning in future research

AU - Breitenbauch, Henrik

AU - Jakobsson, André Ken

PY - 2018/7/3

Y1 - 2018/7/3

N2 - Through the contributions of this special issue, defence planning emerges as a strategic fact with a significance of its own. Defence planning does not merely serve as a conduit for external forces, but instead appears as an independent or intermediate variable as well as a discrete arena for national security processing. In this conclusion, we return to the overall issue of defence planning as an object of study as proposed in the introduction. We identify three analytical dimensions inspired by the contributions which offer avenues for future research on defence planning. These are process versus change, the issue of national versus comparative or international dynamics, and finally hybrid or interface dynamics. It is, in other words, important to account for the roles defence planning may play with regard to affecting change in strategic affairs, to deepen our understanding of the dynamics of defence planning in central national cases such as the US as well as the international and comparative aspects of such dynamics, and finally it is important to analyse the characteristics and effects of defence planning in its wider political, administrative and strategic contexts.

AB - Through the contributions of this special issue, defence planning emerges as a strategic fact with a significance of its own. Defence planning does not merely serve as a conduit for external forces, but instead appears as an independent or intermediate variable as well as a discrete arena for national security processing. In this conclusion, we return to the overall issue of defence planning as an object of study as proposed in the introduction. We identify three analytical dimensions inspired by the contributions which offer avenues for future research on defence planning. These are process versus change, the issue of national versus comparative or international dynamics, and finally hybrid or interface dynamics. It is, in other words, important to account for the roles defence planning may play with regard to affecting change in strategic affairs, to deepen our understanding of the dynamics of defence planning in central national cases such as the US as well as the international and comparative aspects of such dynamics, and finally it is important to analyse the characteristics and effects of defence planning in its wider political, administrative and strategic contexts.

KW - defence organization

KW - Defence planning

KW - defence policy

KW - strategic fact

U2 - 10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447

DO - 10.1080/14702436.2018.1497447

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85051216409

VL - 18

SP - 391

EP - 394

JO - Defence Studies

JF - Defence Studies

SN - 1470-2436

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 201045487