Class size versus class composition: What matters for learning in East Africa?

Research output: Working paperResearch

Standard

Class size versus class composition : What matters for learning in East Africa? / Jones, Sam.

2013/065. ed. Helsinki : UNU-WIDER, 2013.

Research output: Working paperResearch

Harvard

Jones, S 2013 'Class size versus class composition: What matters for learning in East Africa?' 2013/065 edn, UNU-WIDER, Helsinki. <https://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2013/en_GB/wp2013-065/_files/89920773912789378/default/WP2013-065.pdf>

APA

Jones, S. (2013). Class size versus class composition: What matters for learning in East Africa? (2013/065 ed.) UNU-WIDER. WIDER Working Paper Vol. 2013 No. 065 https://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2013/en_GB/wp2013-065/_files/89920773912789378/default/WP2013-065.pdf

Vancouver

Jones S. Class size versus class composition: What matters for learning in East Africa? 2013/065 ed. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER. 2013.

Author

Jones, Sam. / Class size versus class composition : What matters for learning in East Africa?. 2013/065. ed. Helsinki : UNU-WIDER, 2013. (WIDER Working Paper; No. 065, Vol. 2013).

Bibtex

@techreport{42119bfc35ac40b6a7f60d4c5dfeb5be,
title = "Class size versus class composition: What matters for learning in East Africa?",
abstract = "Raising schooling quality in low-income countries is a pressing challenge. Substantial research has considered the impact of cutting class sizes on skills acquisition. Considerably less attention has been given to the extent to which peer effects, which refer to class composition, also may affect outcomes. This study uses new microdata from East Africa, incorporating test score data for over 250,000 children, to compare the likely efficacy of these two types of interventions. Endogeneity bias is addressed via fixed effects and instrumentalvariables techniques. Although these may not fully mitigate bias from omitted variables, the preferred IV results indicate considerable negative effects due to larger class sizes and larger numbers of overage-for-grade peers. The latter, driven by the highly prevalent practices of grade repetition and academic redshirting, should be considered an important target for policy interventions.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, East Africa, education, peer effects, class size",
author = "Sam Jones",
note = "JEL classification: J01, I21, I25, I28",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
series = "WIDER Working Paper",
number = "065",
publisher = "UNU-WIDER",
edition = "2013/065",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "UNU-WIDER",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Class size versus class composition

T2 - What matters for learning in East Africa?

AU - Jones, Sam

N1 - JEL classification: J01, I21, I25, I28

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Raising schooling quality in low-income countries is a pressing challenge. Substantial research has considered the impact of cutting class sizes on skills acquisition. Considerably less attention has been given to the extent to which peer effects, which refer to class composition, also may affect outcomes. This study uses new microdata from East Africa, incorporating test score data for over 250,000 children, to compare the likely efficacy of these two types of interventions. Endogeneity bias is addressed via fixed effects and instrumentalvariables techniques. Although these may not fully mitigate bias from omitted variables, the preferred IV results indicate considerable negative effects due to larger class sizes and larger numbers of overage-for-grade peers. The latter, driven by the highly prevalent practices of grade repetition and academic redshirting, should be considered an important target for policy interventions.

AB - Raising schooling quality in low-income countries is a pressing challenge. Substantial research has considered the impact of cutting class sizes on skills acquisition. Considerably less attention has been given to the extent to which peer effects, which refer to class composition, also may affect outcomes. This study uses new microdata from East Africa, incorporating test score data for over 250,000 children, to compare the likely efficacy of these two types of interventions. Endogeneity bias is addressed via fixed effects and instrumentalvariables techniques. Although these may not fully mitigate bias from omitted variables, the preferred IV results indicate considerable negative effects due to larger class sizes and larger numbers of overage-for-grade peers. The latter, driven by the highly prevalent practices of grade repetition and academic redshirting, should be considered an important target for policy interventions.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - East Africa

KW - education

KW - peer effects

KW - class size

M3 - Working paper

T3 - WIDER Working Paper

BT - Class size versus class composition

PB - UNU-WIDER

CY - Helsinki

ER -

ID: 100445422