All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review

Standard

All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations. / Jensen, Lasse Meinert.

2012. Paper presented at The European Association for Research in Personality's 16th conference on personality, Trieste, Italy.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Jensen, LM 2012, 'All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations', Paper presented at The European Association for Research in Personality's 16th conference on personality, Trieste, Italy, 10/07/2012 - 15/07/2012.

APA

Jensen, L. M. (2012). All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations. Paper presented at The European Association for Research in Personality's 16th conference on personality, Trieste, Italy.

Vancouver

Jensen LM. All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations. 2012. Paper presented at The European Association for Research in Personality's 16th conference on personality, Trieste, Italy.

Author

Jensen, Lasse Meinert. / All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations. Paper presented at The European Association for Research in Personality's 16th conference on personality, Trieste, Italy.

Bibtex

@conference{cbd3e490d60b11df825b000ea68e967b,
title = "All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations",
abstract = "Can the similarities and differences between persons{\textquoteright} daily situations provide clues to the theoretic understanding of person-situation interactions? Using a Day Reconstruction Method design (Kahneman et al., 2004), and drawing on modern idiographic (Conner et al., 2009) and within-person research (Fleeson, 2007), a series of studies analyzed person-situation interactions in the course of a day for a sample of 171 respondents. Multilevel modeling analyses showed (a) substantial within-person variability in the relatively short span of a day, (b) significant situation effects, and (c) significant effect of persons{\textquoteright} situational concerns and intentions upon fluctuations in quality of experience. This paper will argue that the combination of findings (a) and (b) goes against the interpretation that persons merely “react” to situational features, and instead points to how subjective and agentic features of the person shape experience by way of guiding the person{\textquoteright}s interaction with the situations of everyday life. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Personality, Person-situation interactions, Day Reconstruction Method, Multilevel Modeling",
author = "Jensen, {Lasse Meinert}",
year = "2012",
month = jul,
day = "11",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 10-07-2012 Through 15-07-2012",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - All in a day's work – variability in person-situation interactions in daily life situations

AU - Jensen, Lasse Meinert

PY - 2012/7/11

Y1 - 2012/7/11

N2 - Can the similarities and differences between persons’ daily situations provide clues to the theoretic understanding of person-situation interactions? Using a Day Reconstruction Method design (Kahneman et al., 2004), and drawing on modern idiographic (Conner et al., 2009) and within-person research (Fleeson, 2007), a series of studies analyzed person-situation interactions in the course of a day for a sample of 171 respondents. Multilevel modeling analyses showed (a) substantial within-person variability in the relatively short span of a day, (b) significant situation effects, and (c) significant effect of persons’ situational concerns and intentions upon fluctuations in quality of experience. This paper will argue that the combination of findings (a) and (b) goes against the interpretation that persons merely “react” to situational features, and instead points to how subjective and agentic features of the person shape experience by way of guiding the person’s interaction with the situations of everyday life.

AB - Can the similarities and differences between persons’ daily situations provide clues to the theoretic understanding of person-situation interactions? Using a Day Reconstruction Method design (Kahneman et al., 2004), and drawing on modern idiographic (Conner et al., 2009) and within-person research (Fleeson, 2007), a series of studies analyzed person-situation interactions in the course of a day for a sample of 171 respondents. Multilevel modeling analyses showed (a) substantial within-person variability in the relatively short span of a day, (b) significant situation effects, and (c) significant effect of persons’ situational concerns and intentions upon fluctuations in quality of experience. This paper will argue that the combination of findings (a) and (b) goes against the interpretation that persons merely “react” to situational features, and instead points to how subjective and agentic features of the person shape experience by way of guiding the person’s interaction with the situations of everyday life.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Personality

KW - Person-situation interactions

KW - Day Reconstruction Method

KW - Multilevel Modeling

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 10 July 2012 through 15 July 2012

ER -

ID: 22455920