African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon

Research output: Working paperResearchpeer-review

Standard

African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon. / Emmanuel, Nikolas G.; Schwartz, Brendan.

2017.

Research output: Working paperResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Emmanuel, NG & Schwartz, B 2017 'African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon'.

APA

Emmanuel, N. G., & Schwartz, B. (Accepted/In press). African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon.

Vancouver

Emmanuel NG, Schwartz B. African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon. 2017.

Author

Emmanuel, Nikolas G. ; Schwartz, Brendan. / African Solutions to African Problems? Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon. 2017.

Bibtex

@techreport{85576fea3b11456cb26357d4a72a69ce,
title = "African Solutions to African Problems?: Chad{\textquoteright}s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon",
abstract = "Only a short time ago, the press described President Idriss D{\'e}by{\textquoteright}s regime in Chad as isolated, illegitimate, and barely clinging to power. Yet, while the 2000s were punctuated by coup attempts, armed insurrections and mass desertions in the Chadian armed forces, today D{\'e}by has upgraded his country{\textquoteright}s status into being an assertive and critical regional player. The Chadian President has profited from the incentives set out by the international community to intervene in a variety of African crises (i.e., Mali, Central African Republic and Nigeria), helping consolidate his—until recently—tenuous position at home and abroad. Chad is the current representation of the hackneyed phrase, “African solutions to African problems”. However, one must not forget that Chad{\textquoteright}s meteoric rise has been facilitated by important states in the international system, mainly France but also the United States. The emergence of D{\'e}by{\textquoteright}s Chad depends both on its ability to accomplish sub-imperial tasks encouraged by these actors, while obfuscating undemocratic governance and human rights abuses at home. Nonetheless, D{\'e}by{\textquoteright}s role in regional security has helped him achieve a certain degree of agency in his relationship with the international community, one that would appear on the surface as highly asymmetric. In reality, Chad{\textquoteright}s military interventions are a combination of desire on the part of the international community to stabilize the Sahel along with the result of diverse spectrum of elite Chadian interests to gain legitimacy and maintain control of the state. These range from “liberal” desires to help control the region{\textquoteright}s trouble spots in places like Mali, to clearly illiberal medaling in the domestic affairs of neighbors like the Central African Republic, with the fight against Boko Haram somewhere in the middle. This paper seeks to shed light on the dramatic change in Chad{\textquoteright}s rise from “fragile” state to regional hegemon, without losing sight of its subordinate position in the international system. To do this, we will examine two of Chad{\textquoteright}s recent military interventions (Mali and CAR) and portray them within the context of apparently competing liberal and illiberal interests. This will lead us to a better explanation of D{\'e}by{\textquoteright}s recent rise at home and abroad. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Intervention, Chad, State Building, Africa, Idriss Deby, Civil Conflict",
author = "Emmanuel, {Nikolas G.} and Brendan Schwartz",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - African Solutions to African Problems?

T2 - Chad’s (Il)liberal Interventions and the Making of a Regional Hegemon

AU - Emmanuel, Nikolas G.

AU - Schwartz, Brendan

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Only a short time ago, the press described President Idriss Déby’s regime in Chad as isolated, illegitimate, and barely clinging to power. Yet, while the 2000s were punctuated by coup attempts, armed insurrections and mass desertions in the Chadian armed forces, today Déby has upgraded his country’s status into being an assertive and critical regional player. The Chadian President has profited from the incentives set out by the international community to intervene in a variety of African crises (i.e., Mali, Central African Republic and Nigeria), helping consolidate his—until recently—tenuous position at home and abroad. Chad is the current representation of the hackneyed phrase, “African solutions to African problems”. However, one must not forget that Chad’s meteoric rise has been facilitated by important states in the international system, mainly France but also the United States. The emergence of Déby’s Chad depends both on its ability to accomplish sub-imperial tasks encouraged by these actors, while obfuscating undemocratic governance and human rights abuses at home. Nonetheless, Déby’s role in regional security has helped him achieve a certain degree of agency in his relationship with the international community, one that would appear on the surface as highly asymmetric. In reality, Chad’s military interventions are a combination of desire on the part of the international community to stabilize the Sahel along with the result of diverse spectrum of elite Chadian interests to gain legitimacy and maintain control of the state. These range from “liberal” desires to help control the region’s trouble spots in places like Mali, to clearly illiberal medaling in the domestic affairs of neighbors like the Central African Republic, with the fight against Boko Haram somewhere in the middle. This paper seeks to shed light on the dramatic change in Chad’s rise from “fragile” state to regional hegemon, without losing sight of its subordinate position in the international system. To do this, we will examine two of Chad’s recent military interventions (Mali and CAR) and portray them within the context of apparently competing liberal and illiberal interests. This will lead us to a better explanation of Déby’s recent rise at home and abroad.

AB - Only a short time ago, the press described President Idriss Déby’s regime in Chad as isolated, illegitimate, and barely clinging to power. Yet, while the 2000s were punctuated by coup attempts, armed insurrections and mass desertions in the Chadian armed forces, today Déby has upgraded his country’s status into being an assertive and critical regional player. The Chadian President has profited from the incentives set out by the international community to intervene in a variety of African crises (i.e., Mali, Central African Republic and Nigeria), helping consolidate his—until recently—tenuous position at home and abroad. Chad is the current representation of the hackneyed phrase, “African solutions to African problems”. However, one must not forget that Chad’s meteoric rise has been facilitated by important states in the international system, mainly France but also the United States. The emergence of Déby’s Chad depends both on its ability to accomplish sub-imperial tasks encouraged by these actors, while obfuscating undemocratic governance and human rights abuses at home. Nonetheless, Déby’s role in regional security has helped him achieve a certain degree of agency in his relationship with the international community, one that would appear on the surface as highly asymmetric. In reality, Chad’s military interventions are a combination of desire on the part of the international community to stabilize the Sahel along with the result of diverse spectrum of elite Chadian interests to gain legitimacy and maintain control of the state. These range from “liberal” desires to help control the region’s trouble spots in places like Mali, to clearly illiberal medaling in the domestic affairs of neighbors like the Central African Republic, with the fight against Boko Haram somewhere in the middle. This paper seeks to shed light on the dramatic change in Chad’s rise from “fragile” state to regional hegemon, without losing sight of its subordinate position in the international system. To do this, we will examine two of Chad’s recent military interventions (Mali and CAR) and portray them within the context of apparently competing liberal and illiberal interests. This will lead us to a better explanation of Déby’s recent rise at home and abroad.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Intervention

KW - Chad

KW - State Building

KW - Africa

KW - Idriss Deby

KW - Civil Conflict

M3 - Working paper

BT - African Solutions to African Problems?

ER -

ID: 174939618