Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings: Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings : Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine. / Wæver, Ole.
In: Globalizations, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2023, p. 1187-1194.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Futures, Events and Excessive Learnings
T2 - Review of Forsberg and Patomäki, Debating the War in Ukraine
AU - Wæver, Ole
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Futures past, historically open when they were our present, are often recast as pre-determined after dramatic events. The war in Ukraine displays this pattern, and makes the book by Forsberg and Patomäki so welcome. It allows nuanced discussions of counterfactuals and causal complexes when the political climate favors reductionist, deterministic interpretations of who and what caused the war and what this implies for future possibilities. The book’s dialogue format facilitates balanced analysis and its structure aroundtime phases adds complexity. Prevailing excessive learnings produce powerful policy guidance on false premises. However, the book underestimates the political forces involved in the writing of history treating public knowledge as an intellectual investigation writ large. Excessive mislearnings from the past follow not primarily from cognitive limitations distributed evenly – they are shaped by political struggles and a dominant folk conception of the nature of international relations. Enriching the analysis with a political sociology of knowledge.
AB - Futures past, historically open when they were our present, are often recast as pre-determined after dramatic events. The war in Ukraine displays this pattern, and makes the book by Forsberg and Patomäki so welcome. It allows nuanced discussions of counterfactuals and causal complexes when the political climate favors reductionist, deterministic interpretations of who and what caused the war and what this implies for future possibilities. The book’s dialogue format facilitates balanced analysis and its structure aroundtime phases adds complexity. Prevailing excessive learnings produce powerful policy guidance on false premises. However, the book underestimates the political forces involved in the writing of history treating public knowledge as an intellectual investigation writ large. Excessive mislearnings from the past follow not primarily from cognitive limitations distributed evenly – they are shaped by political struggles and a dominant folk conception of the nature of international relations. Enriching the analysis with a political sociology of knowledge.
U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594
DO - 10.1080/14747731.2023.2228594
M3 - Journal article
VL - 20
SP - 1187
EP - 1194
JO - Globalizations
JF - Globalizations
SN - 1474-7731
IS - 7
ER -
ID: 337432623