(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making. / Rasmussen, Anne; Reher, Stefanie.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, 2023, p. 45–64.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rasmussen, A & Reher, S 2023, '(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making', British Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, pp. 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000242

APA

Rasmussen, A., & Reher, S. (2023). (Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making. British Journal of Political Science, 53, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000242

Vancouver

Rasmussen A, Reher S. (Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making. British Journal of Political Science. 2023;53:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000242

Author

Rasmussen, Anne ; Reher, Stefanie. / (Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making. In: British Journal of Political Science. 2023 ; Vol. 53. pp. 45–64.

Bibtex

@article{4df74bd9d647451d98a813620e816429,
title = "(Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making",
abstract = "While interest groups are consulted at different stages of policy making to provide expertise and legitimacy, their influence is often criticized as being undemocratic. Yet, we know little about how their participation in policy making affects citizen perceptions of the legitimacy of governance. Based on survey experiments conducted in the UK, the United States and Germany, our study shows that unequal participation between group types reduces the benefits of interest group consultation for citizens' perceived legitimacy of decision-making processes. Importantly, these legitimacy losses cannot be compensated for by policies that represent the opinion of the under-represented groups and are even greater when policy decisions favour the over-represented groups. Moreover, we show that citizen perceptions of how economically powerful and representative of society different types of interest groups are act as important drivers of legitimacy evaluations. Our results provide important new theoretical and empirical insights into when and why interest groups affect democratic legitimacy.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, organized interests, legitimacy, policy representation, public policy, public opinion, survey experiment",
author = "Anne Rasmussen and Stefanie Reher",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123422000242",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "45–64",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy Making

AU - Rasmussen, Anne

AU - Reher, Stefanie

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - While interest groups are consulted at different stages of policy making to provide expertise and legitimacy, their influence is often criticized as being undemocratic. Yet, we know little about how their participation in policy making affects citizen perceptions of the legitimacy of governance. Based on survey experiments conducted in the UK, the United States and Germany, our study shows that unequal participation between group types reduces the benefits of interest group consultation for citizens' perceived legitimacy of decision-making processes. Importantly, these legitimacy losses cannot be compensated for by policies that represent the opinion of the under-represented groups and are even greater when policy decisions favour the over-represented groups. Moreover, we show that citizen perceptions of how economically powerful and representative of society different types of interest groups are act as important drivers of legitimacy evaluations. Our results provide important new theoretical and empirical insights into when and why interest groups affect democratic legitimacy.

AB - While interest groups are consulted at different stages of policy making to provide expertise and legitimacy, their influence is often criticized as being undemocratic. Yet, we know little about how their participation in policy making affects citizen perceptions of the legitimacy of governance. Based on survey experiments conducted in the UK, the United States and Germany, our study shows that unequal participation between group types reduces the benefits of interest group consultation for citizens' perceived legitimacy of decision-making processes. Importantly, these legitimacy losses cannot be compensated for by policies that represent the opinion of the under-represented groups and are even greater when policy decisions favour the over-represented groups. Moreover, we show that citizen perceptions of how economically powerful and representative of society different types of interest groups are act as important drivers of legitimacy evaluations. Our results provide important new theoretical and empirical insights into when and why interest groups affect democratic legitimacy.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - organized interests

KW - legitimacy

KW - policy representation

KW - public policy

KW - public opinion

KW - survey experiment

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123422000242

DO - 10.1017/S0007123422000242

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 45

EP - 64

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

ER -

ID: 302546436