Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. / el-Wakil, Alice.

In: journal of deliberative democracy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2020, p. 37–45.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

el-Wakil, A 2020, 'Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives', journal of deliberative democracy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.403

APA

el-Wakil, A. (2020). Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. journal of deliberative democracy, 16(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.403

Vancouver

el-Wakil A. Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. journal of deliberative democracy. 2020;16(1):37–45. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.403

Author

el-Wakil, Alice. / Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. In: journal of deliberative democracy. 2020 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 37–45.

Bibtex

@article{087e72309ff74493a86c7d5c061750b5,
title = "Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives",
abstract = "Referendums and initiatives have long been described as deliberatively deficient and unfit to implement deliberative democracy. Categorized as aggregative mechanisms, they would undermine quality deliberation by setting predefined policy options to potentially polarizing mass votes, with no room for face-to-face exchange nor opportunities for citizens to develop informed judgments. Recent developments in deliberative democratic theory increasingly challenge this view. This article builds on this literature to argue that referendums and initiatives can serve deliberative systems by incentivising representatives to engage in recursive representation – namely, conversation-like exchange at the mass level with the represented deemed essential to deliberative systems. They do so by modifying the formal opportunity structure of representative actors, which impacts them in popular vote campaigns – but also over the long term. Acknowledging these long-term effects of systems including referendums and initiatives opens new questions that can guide further research on these processes{\textquoteright} value for deliberative democracy.",
author = "Alice el-Wakil",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.16997/jdd.403",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "37–45",
journal = "journal of deliberative democracy",
issn = "2634-0488",
publisher = "University of Westminster Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives

AU - el-Wakil, Alice

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Referendums and initiatives have long been described as deliberatively deficient and unfit to implement deliberative democracy. Categorized as aggregative mechanisms, they would undermine quality deliberation by setting predefined policy options to potentially polarizing mass votes, with no room for face-to-face exchange nor opportunities for citizens to develop informed judgments. Recent developments in deliberative democratic theory increasingly challenge this view. This article builds on this literature to argue that referendums and initiatives can serve deliberative systems by incentivising representatives to engage in recursive representation – namely, conversation-like exchange at the mass level with the represented deemed essential to deliberative systems. They do so by modifying the formal opportunity structure of representative actors, which impacts them in popular vote campaigns – but also over the long term. Acknowledging these long-term effects of systems including referendums and initiatives opens new questions that can guide further research on these processes’ value for deliberative democracy.

AB - Referendums and initiatives have long been described as deliberatively deficient and unfit to implement deliberative democracy. Categorized as aggregative mechanisms, they would undermine quality deliberation by setting predefined policy options to potentially polarizing mass votes, with no room for face-to-face exchange nor opportunities for citizens to develop informed judgments. Recent developments in deliberative democratic theory increasingly challenge this view. This article builds on this literature to argue that referendums and initiatives can serve deliberative systems by incentivising representatives to engage in recursive representation – namely, conversation-like exchange at the mass level with the represented deemed essential to deliberative systems. They do so by modifying the formal opportunity structure of representative actors, which impacts them in popular vote campaigns – but also over the long term. Acknowledging these long-term effects of systems including referendums and initiatives opens new questions that can guide further research on these processes’ value for deliberative democracy.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.16997/jdd.403

U2 - 10.16997/jdd.403

DO - 10.16997/jdd.403

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 37

EP - 45

JO - journal of deliberative democracy

JF - journal of deliberative democracy

SN - 2634-0488

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 320497065