Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’. / el-Wakil, Alice; McKay, Spencer.

In: Representation, 2020, p. 435–447.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

el-Wakil, A & McKay, S 2020, 'Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’', Representation, pp. 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

APA

el-Wakil, A., & McKay, S. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’. Representation, 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

Vancouver

el-Wakil A, McKay S. Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’. Representation. 2020;435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

Author

el-Wakil, Alice ; McKay, Spencer. / Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’. In: Representation. 2020 ; pp. 435–447.

Bibtex

@article{0936c8fa7d9e4811b21bf0f3cdadeefb,
title = "Introduction to the Special Issue {\textquoteleft}Beyond {\textquoteleft}Direct Democracy{\textquoteright}: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems{\textquoteright}",
abstract = "Despite controversy over recent referendums and initiatives, populists and social movements continue to call for the use of these popular vote processes. Most political and academic debates about whether these calls should be answered have adopted a dominant framework that focuses on whether we should favour {\textquoteleft}direct{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}representative{\textquoteright} democracy. However, this framework obscures more urgent questions about whether, when, and how popular vote processes should be implemented in democratic systems. How do popular vote processes interact with representative institutions? And how could these interactions be democratized? The contributions in this special issue address these and related questions by replacing the framework of {\textquoteleft}direct democracy{\textquoteright} with systemic approaches. The normative contributions illustrate how these approaches enable the development of counternarratives about the value of popular vote processes and clarify the nature of the underlying ideals they should realize. The empirical contributions examine recent cases with a variety of methodological tools, demonstrating that systemic approaches attentive to context can generate new insights about the use of popular vote processes. This introduction puts these contributions into conversation to illustrate how a shift in approach establishes a basis for (re-)evaluating existing practices and guiding reforms sothat referendums and initiatives foster democracy.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Citizen participation, representative democracy, referendums, initiatives, deliberation",
author = "Alice el-Wakil and Spencer McKay",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370",
language = "English",
pages = "435–447",
journal = "Representation",
issn = "0034-4893",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’

AU - el-Wakil, Alice

AU - McKay, Spencer

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Despite controversy over recent referendums and initiatives, populists and social movements continue to call for the use of these popular vote processes. Most political and academic debates about whether these calls should be answered have adopted a dominant framework that focuses on whether we should favour ‘direct’ or ‘representative’ democracy. However, this framework obscures more urgent questions about whether, when, and how popular vote processes should be implemented in democratic systems. How do popular vote processes interact with representative institutions? And how could these interactions be democratized? The contributions in this special issue address these and related questions by replacing the framework of ‘direct democracy’ with systemic approaches. The normative contributions illustrate how these approaches enable the development of counternarratives about the value of popular vote processes and clarify the nature of the underlying ideals they should realize. The empirical contributions examine recent cases with a variety of methodological tools, demonstrating that systemic approaches attentive to context can generate new insights about the use of popular vote processes. This introduction puts these contributions into conversation to illustrate how a shift in approach establishes a basis for (re-)evaluating existing practices and guiding reforms sothat referendums and initiatives foster democracy.

AB - Despite controversy over recent referendums and initiatives, populists and social movements continue to call for the use of these popular vote processes. Most political and academic debates about whether these calls should be answered have adopted a dominant framework that focuses on whether we should favour ‘direct’ or ‘representative’ democracy. However, this framework obscures more urgent questions about whether, when, and how popular vote processes should be implemented in democratic systems. How do popular vote processes interact with representative institutions? And how could these interactions be democratized? The contributions in this special issue address these and related questions by replacing the framework of ‘direct democracy’ with systemic approaches. The normative contributions illustrate how these approaches enable the development of counternarratives about the value of popular vote processes and clarify the nature of the underlying ideals they should realize. The empirical contributions examine recent cases with a variety of methodological tools, demonstrating that systemic approaches attentive to context can generate new insights about the use of popular vote processes. This introduction puts these contributions into conversation to illustrate how a shift in approach establishes a basis for (re-)evaluating existing practices and guiding reforms sothat referendums and initiatives foster democracy.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Citizen participation

KW - representative democracy

KW - referendums

KW - initiatives

KW - deliberation

UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

U2 - 10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

DO - 10.1080/00344893.2020.1820370

M3 - Journal article

SP - 435

EP - 447

JO - Representation

JF - Representation

SN - 0034-4893

ER -

ID: 320496779