Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments: What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics?

Research output: Working paper › Research

Standard

Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments : What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics? / Dahl, Malte .

Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen, 2018.

Research output: Working paper › Research

Harvard

Dahl, M 2018 'Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments: What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics?' Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen.

APA

Dahl, M. (2018). Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments: What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics? Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen.

Vancouver

Dahl M. Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments: What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics? Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen. 2018 Sep.

Author

Dahl, Malte . / Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments : What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics?. Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen, 2018.

Bibtex

@techreport{a9e0142f7a6f4f7cbd17014d897d5c22,
title = "Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments: What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics?",
abstract = "An often-mentioned advantage of conjoint experiments over traditional survey experimental designs is that the former have the potential to mitigate social desirability bias. To what extent this is true may depend on a number of design choices -- a concern that has received surprisingly little empirical attention. I conducted two studies in which I randomly assigned respondents to three types of conjoint designs in order to manipulate their awareness to sensitive features and possibilities for justifying inappropriate answers (N = 7,059). The results show that design variations signicantly affect respondents' inferences about the research objective. However, there are no detectable differences between respondents' preferences across designs. This indicates that researchers using conjoint experiments should not compromise their choice of design to avoid social desirability bias.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences",
author = "Malte Dahl",
year = "2018",
month = sep,
language = "English",
publisher = "Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments

T2 - What is the optimal design when studying sensitive topics?

AU - Dahl, Malte

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - An often-mentioned advantage of conjoint experiments over traditional survey experimental designs is that the former have the potential to mitigate social desirability bias. To what extent this is true may depend on a number of design choices -- a concern that has received surprisingly little empirical attention. I conducted two studies in which I randomly assigned respondents to three types of conjoint designs in order to manipulate their awareness to sensitive features and possibilities for justifying inappropriate answers (N = 7,059). The results show that design variations signicantly affect respondents' inferences about the research objective. However, there are no detectable differences between respondents' preferences across designs. This indicates that researchers using conjoint experiments should not compromise their choice of design to avoid social desirability bias.

AB - An often-mentioned advantage of conjoint experiments over traditional survey experimental designs is that the former have the potential to mitigate social desirability bias. To what extent this is true may depend on a number of design choices -- a concern that has received surprisingly little empirical attention. I conducted two studies in which I randomly assigned respondents to three types of conjoint designs in order to manipulate their awareness to sensitive features and possibilities for justifying inappropriate answers (N = 7,059). The results show that design variations signicantly affect respondents' inferences about the research objective. However, there are no detectable differences between respondents' preferences across designs. This indicates that researchers using conjoint experiments should not compromise their choice of design to avoid social desirability bias.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

M3 - Working paper

BT - Social desirability bias in candidate conjoint experiments

PB - Department of Political Sceince, University of Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 203378029