Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy. / Kreiner, Claus Thustrup; Nielsen, Torben Heien; Serena, Benjamin Ly.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, No. 46, 13.11.2018, p. 11754-11759.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Kreiner, CT, Nielsen, TH & Serena, BL 2018, 'Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 46, pp. 11754-11759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811455115

APA

Kreiner, C. T., Nielsen, T. H., & Serena, B. L. (2018). Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(46), 11754-11759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811455115

Vancouver

Kreiner CT, Nielsen TH, Serena BL. Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):11754-11759. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811455115

Author

Kreiner, Claus Thustrup ; Nielsen, Torben Heien ; Serena, Benjamin Ly. / Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018 ; Vol. 115, No. 46. pp. 11754-11759.

Bibtex

@article{c249fa87178a4ef2ba53dab054842102,
title = "Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy",
abstract = "This work proposes a method to compute the income gradient in period life expectancy that accounts for income mobility. Using income and mortality records of the Danish population over the period 1980–2013, we validate the method and provide estimates of the income gradient. The period life expectancy of individuals at a certain age, and belonging to a certain income class, is normally computed by using the mortality of older cohorts in the same income class. This approach does not take into account that a substantial fraction of the population moves away from their original income class, which leads to an upward bias in the estimation of the income gradient in life expectancy. For 40-y-olds in the bottom 5% of the income distribution, the risk of dying before age 60 is overestimated by 25%. For the top 5% income class, the risk of dying is underestimated by 20%. By incorporating a classic approach from the social mobility literature, we provide a method that predicts income mobility and future mortality simultaneously. With this method, the association between income and life expectancy is lower throughout the income distribution. Without accounting for income mobility, the estimated difference in life expectancy between persons in percentiles 20 and 80 in the income distribution is 4.6 y for males and 4.1 y for females, while it is only half as big when accounting for mobility. The estimated rise in life-expectancy inequality over time is also halved when accounting for income mobility.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, life expectancy, mortality, inequality, income mobility",
author = "Kreiner, {Claus Thustrup} and Nielsen, {Torben Heien} and Serena, {Benjamin Ly}",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1811455115",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "11754--11759",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
number = "46",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of income mobility for the measurement of inequality in life expectancy

AU - Kreiner, Claus Thustrup

AU - Nielsen, Torben Heien

AU - Serena, Benjamin Ly

PY - 2018/11/13

Y1 - 2018/11/13

N2 - This work proposes a method to compute the income gradient in period life expectancy that accounts for income mobility. Using income and mortality records of the Danish population over the period 1980–2013, we validate the method and provide estimates of the income gradient. The period life expectancy of individuals at a certain age, and belonging to a certain income class, is normally computed by using the mortality of older cohorts in the same income class. This approach does not take into account that a substantial fraction of the population moves away from their original income class, which leads to an upward bias in the estimation of the income gradient in life expectancy. For 40-y-olds in the bottom 5% of the income distribution, the risk of dying before age 60 is overestimated by 25%. For the top 5% income class, the risk of dying is underestimated by 20%. By incorporating a classic approach from the social mobility literature, we provide a method that predicts income mobility and future mortality simultaneously. With this method, the association between income and life expectancy is lower throughout the income distribution. Without accounting for income mobility, the estimated difference in life expectancy between persons in percentiles 20 and 80 in the income distribution is 4.6 y for males and 4.1 y for females, while it is only half as big when accounting for mobility. The estimated rise in life-expectancy inequality over time is also halved when accounting for income mobility.

AB - This work proposes a method to compute the income gradient in period life expectancy that accounts for income mobility. Using income and mortality records of the Danish population over the period 1980–2013, we validate the method and provide estimates of the income gradient. The period life expectancy of individuals at a certain age, and belonging to a certain income class, is normally computed by using the mortality of older cohorts in the same income class. This approach does not take into account that a substantial fraction of the population moves away from their original income class, which leads to an upward bias in the estimation of the income gradient in life expectancy. For 40-y-olds in the bottom 5% of the income distribution, the risk of dying before age 60 is overestimated by 25%. For the top 5% income class, the risk of dying is underestimated by 20%. By incorporating a classic approach from the social mobility literature, we provide a method that predicts income mobility and future mortality simultaneously. With this method, the association between income and life expectancy is lower throughout the income distribution. Without accounting for income mobility, the estimated difference in life expectancy between persons in percentiles 20 and 80 in the income distribution is 4.6 y for males and 4.1 y for females, while it is only half as big when accounting for mobility. The estimated rise in life-expectancy inequality over time is also halved when accounting for income mobility.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - life expectancy

KW - mortality

KW - inequality

KW - income mobility

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1811455115

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1811455115

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30373814

VL - 115

SP - 11754

EP - 11759

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 46

ER -

ID: 204461173