Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas. / Zhelyazkova, Asya; Kaya, Cansarp; Schrama, Reini Margriet.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2, 07.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Zhelyazkova, A, Kaya, C & Schrama, RM 2017, 'Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas', Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 24, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084

APA

Zhelyazkova, A., Kaya, C., & Schrama, R. M. (2017). Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084

Vancouver

Zhelyazkova A, Kaya C, Schrama RM. Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas. Journal of European Public Policy. 2017 Feb 7;24(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084

Author

Zhelyazkova, Asya ; Kaya, Cansarp ; Schrama, Reini Margriet. / Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas. In: Journal of European Public Policy. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{1fac31e2b67241899cf4e6ebc60fab49,
title = "Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas",
abstract = "Whereas quantitative studies show that the {\textquoteleft}new{\textquoteright} EU entrants from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) are the forerunners in the transposition of EU directives, case studies indicate the existence of a gap between legal and practical compliance. This study aims to reconcile these divergent findings by comparing member states{\textquoteright} performance regarding different compliance aspects: delayed transposition; legal and practical conformity. We address the following questions: Do we observe systematic variation in compliance (a) between different EU member states, (b) between different forms of compliance? To what extent do preference- and capacity-based factors explain differences in implementation between the EU-15 and the EU-10 states? Our analysis shows that the CEE member states are generally more efficient in transposing the EU rules than their Western counterparts. In addition and with the exception of social policy directives, the CEE member states do not lag behind the EU-15 countries with respect to practical implementation.",
author = "Asya Zhelyazkova and Cansarp Kaya and Schrama, {Reini Margriet}",
year = "2017",
month = feb,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas

AU - Zhelyazkova, Asya

AU - Kaya, Cansarp

AU - Schrama, Reini Margriet

PY - 2017/2/7

Y1 - 2017/2/7

N2 - Whereas quantitative studies show that the ‘new’ EU entrants from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) are the forerunners in the transposition of EU directives, case studies indicate the existence of a gap between legal and practical compliance. This study aims to reconcile these divergent findings by comparing member states’ performance regarding different compliance aspects: delayed transposition; legal and practical conformity. We address the following questions: Do we observe systematic variation in compliance (a) between different EU member states, (b) between different forms of compliance? To what extent do preference- and capacity-based factors explain differences in implementation between the EU-15 and the EU-10 states? Our analysis shows that the CEE member states are generally more efficient in transposing the EU rules than their Western counterparts. In addition and with the exception of social policy directives, the CEE member states do not lag behind the EU-15 countries with respect to practical implementation.

AB - Whereas quantitative studies show that the ‘new’ EU entrants from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) are the forerunners in the transposition of EU directives, case studies indicate the existence of a gap between legal and practical compliance. This study aims to reconcile these divergent findings by comparing member states’ performance regarding different compliance aspects: delayed transposition; legal and practical conformity. We address the following questions: Do we observe systematic variation in compliance (a) between different EU member states, (b) between different forms of compliance? To what extent do preference- and capacity-based factors explain differences in implementation between the EU-15 and the EU-10 states? Our analysis shows that the CEE member states are generally more efficient in transposing the EU rules than their Western counterparts. In addition and with the exception of social policy directives, the CEE member states do not lag behind the EU-15 countries with respect to practical implementation.

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 197849896