Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Standard

Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave. / Dahler-Larsen, Peter.

2019. Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Dahler-Larsen, P 2019, 'Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave', Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 04/07/2019 - 06/07/2019.

APA

Dahler-Larsen, P. (2019). Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave. Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Vancouver

Dahler-Larsen P. Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave. 2019. Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Author

Dahler-Larsen, Peter. / Lost and found, and lost again? Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave. Paper presented at EGOS Colloquium, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.14 p.

Bibtex

@conference{01f6fc9fb7d144349cd09424b1369c1f,
title = "Lost and found, and lost again?: Tracing moral-political values in understandings of the evaluation wave",
abstract = "How do we understand the socio-historically unprecedented wave of evaluation which characterizes contemporary society? The article discusses five mental models that offer typical perspectives on evaluation. It is shown that each of them are also moral-political stances. The article discusses whether these stances too obviously reflect positions or “character masks” which characterize typical functional roles in modern organizations in relation to evaluation systems, thereby merely reproducing “folk tales” which already circulate in the evaluation society. The article discusses what would be required for a perspective on evaluation which takes evaluation seriously at the same time as the institutional and normative underpinnings under evaluation are kept open for democratic scrutiny",
author = "Peter Dahler-Larsen",
note = "Presented at the EGOS conference; null ; Conference date: 04-07-2019 Through 06-07-2019",
year = "2019",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Lost and found, and lost again?

AU - Dahler-Larsen, Peter

N1 - Presented at the EGOS conference

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - How do we understand the socio-historically unprecedented wave of evaluation which characterizes contemporary society? The article discusses five mental models that offer typical perspectives on evaluation. It is shown that each of them are also moral-political stances. The article discusses whether these stances too obviously reflect positions or “character masks” which characterize typical functional roles in modern organizations in relation to evaluation systems, thereby merely reproducing “folk tales” which already circulate in the evaluation society. The article discusses what would be required for a perspective on evaluation which takes evaluation seriously at the same time as the institutional and normative underpinnings under evaluation are kept open for democratic scrutiny

AB - How do we understand the socio-historically unprecedented wave of evaluation which characterizes contemporary society? The article discusses five mental models that offer typical perspectives on evaluation. It is shown that each of them are also moral-political stances. The article discusses whether these stances too obviously reflect positions or “character masks” which characterize typical functional roles in modern organizations in relation to evaluation systems, thereby merely reproducing “folk tales” which already circulate in the evaluation society. The article discusses what would be required for a perspective on evaluation which takes evaluation seriously at the same time as the institutional and normative underpinnings under evaluation are kept open for democratic scrutiny

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 4 July 2019 through 6 July 2019

ER -

ID: 225379038