Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearchpeer-review

Standard

Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence. / Schaub Jr, Gary John; Michaelsen, Hans Peter.

Copenhagen : Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet, 2018. 71 p. (CMS Report; No. 5, Vol. 2018).

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schaub Jr, GJ & Michaelsen, HP 2018, Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence. CMS Report, no. 5, vol. 2018, Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen.

APA

Schaub Jr, G. J., & Michaelsen, H. P. (2018). Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence. Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet. CMS Report Vol. 2018 No. 5

Vancouver

Schaub Jr GJ, Michaelsen HP. Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence. Copenhagen: Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet, 2018. 71 p. (CMS Report; No. 5, Vol. 2018).

Author

Schaub Jr, Gary John ; Michaelsen, Hans Peter. / Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence. Copenhagen : Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet, 2018. 71 p. (CMS Report; No. 5, Vol. 2018).

Bibtex

@book{e2b9411d42c74cff9c46039b6913b79c,
title = "Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence",
abstract = "In June 2016, the Danish Parliament approved the procurement of 27 F-35 fighter aircraft to replace the Royal Danish Air Force{\textquoteright}s remaining fleet of 30 operational F-16s. Scheduled for delivery between 2021 and 2026, the F-35acquisition is only the first of a number of decisions to be taken in the coming years. Previous fighter aircraft acquisitions reveal three sets of risks and challenges inherent in such decisions. The first set of risks concerns the building of a sufficient organizational structure around the aircraft so that they can perform the set of tasks expected by the Parliament. Adequate numbers of pilots, technicians, and flight engineers must be trained in time to fly and maintain the aircraft to meet the schedule for their delivery accepted by the Parliament. The facilities at Skrydstrup Air Base must also be ready to house, service, and protect the aircraft. The second set of risks concerns the integration of the new aircraft into the Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) and the Danish armed forces more broadly. In the past, new aircraft enabled the RDAF to expand the types of tasks that it could perform, including how it interacted with the forces of the Royal Danish Navy and Army, and the forces of Denmark{\textquoteright}s NATO allies. The third set of risks arise from the possibility that the aircraft can be used in new ways to address currently unforeseeable security challenges. The F-16 fleet played a substantial role in enabling Danish leaders to respond to changes in the international security environment after the Cold War. The F-35 will likely play a similarly fluid role over the course of its 40-year life expectancy. This report analyses these risks and challenges in light of Denmark{\textquoteright}s experience with the F-16, the plans of its North European partners in the F35 programme, and the broader security environment for Danish defence policy. The report concludes with potential considerations for Danish policy makers. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, F-35, Air Force, airpower, defence, defence planning, defence policy, acquisition, procurement, Organization and Administration, NATO, USA, Denmark, Norway, Netherlands, United Kingdom",
author = "{Schaub Jr}, {Gary John} and Michaelsen, {Hans Peter}",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788773938287 ",
series = "CMS Report",
publisher = "Center for Milit{\ae}re Studier, K{\o}benhavns Universitet",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - RPRT

T1 - Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence

AU - Schaub Jr, Gary John

AU - Michaelsen, Hans Peter

PY - 2018/11/19

Y1 - 2018/11/19

N2 - In June 2016, the Danish Parliament approved the procurement of 27 F-35 fighter aircraft to replace the Royal Danish Air Force’s remaining fleet of 30 operational F-16s. Scheduled for delivery between 2021 and 2026, the F-35acquisition is only the first of a number of decisions to be taken in the coming years. Previous fighter aircraft acquisitions reveal three sets of risks and challenges inherent in such decisions. The first set of risks concerns the building of a sufficient organizational structure around the aircraft so that they can perform the set of tasks expected by the Parliament. Adequate numbers of pilots, technicians, and flight engineers must be trained in time to fly and maintain the aircraft to meet the schedule for their delivery accepted by the Parliament. The facilities at Skrydstrup Air Base must also be ready to house, service, and protect the aircraft. The second set of risks concerns the integration of the new aircraft into the Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) and the Danish armed forces more broadly. In the past, new aircraft enabled the RDAF to expand the types of tasks that it could perform, including how it interacted with the forces of the Royal Danish Navy and Army, and the forces of Denmark’s NATO allies. The third set of risks arise from the possibility that the aircraft can be used in new ways to address currently unforeseeable security challenges. The F-16 fleet played a substantial role in enabling Danish leaders to respond to changes in the international security environment after the Cold War. The F-35 will likely play a similarly fluid role over the course of its 40-year life expectancy. This report analyses these risks and challenges in light of Denmark’s experience with the F-16, the plans of its North European partners in the F35 programme, and the broader security environment for Danish defence policy. The report concludes with potential considerations for Danish policy makers.

AB - In June 2016, the Danish Parliament approved the procurement of 27 F-35 fighter aircraft to replace the Royal Danish Air Force’s remaining fleet of 30 operational F-16s. Scheduled for delivery between 2021 and 2026, the F-35acquisition is only the first of a number of decisions to be taken in the coming years. Previous fighter aircraft acquisitions reveal three sets of risks and challenges inherent in such decisions. The first set of risks concerns the building of a sufficient organizational structure around the aircraft so that they can perform the set of tasks expected by the Parliament. Adequate numbers of pilots, technicians, and flight engineers must be trained in time to fly and maintain the aircraft to meet the schedule for their delivery accepted by the Parliament. The facilities at Skrydstrup Air Base must also be ready to house, service, and protect the aircraft. The second set of risks concerns the integration of the new aircraft into the Royal Danish Air Force (RDAF) and the Danish armed forces more broadly. In the past, new aircraft enabled the RDAF to expand the types of tasks that it could perform, including how it interacted with the forces of the Royal Danish Navy and Army, and the forces of Denmark’s NATO allies. The third set of risks arise from the possibility that the aircraft can be used in new ways to address currently unforeseeable security challenges. The F-16 fleet played a substantial role in enabling Danish leaders to respond to changes in the international security environment after the Cold War. The F-35 will likely play a similarly fluid role over the course of its 40-year life expectancy. This report analyses these risks and challenges in light of Denmark’s experience with the F-16, the plans of its North European partners in the F35 programme, and the broader security environment for Danish defence policy. The report concludes with potential considerations for Danish policy makers.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - F-35

KW - Air Force

KW - airpower

KW - defence

KW - defence planning

KW - defence policy

KW - acquisition

KW - procurement

KW - Organization and Administration

KW - NATO

KW - USA

KW - Denmark

KW - Norway

KW - Netherlands

KW - United Kingdom

M3 - Report

SN - 9788773938287

T3 - CMS Report

BT - Integrating the F-35 into Danish Defence

PB - Center for Militære Studier, Københavns Universitet

CY - Copenhagen

ER -

ID: 209112438