Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder? / Wivel, Anders.

In: Global Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 4-5, 2018, p. 419-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wivel, A 2018, 'Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder?', Global Affairs, vol. 4, no. 4-5, pp. 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016

APA

Wivel, A. (2018). Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder? Global Affairs, 4(4-5), 419-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016

Vancouver

Wivel A. Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder? Global Affairs. 2018;4(4-5):419-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016

Author

Wivel, Anders. / Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder?. In: Global Affairs. 2018 ; Vol. 4, No. 4-5. pp. 419-434.

Bibtex

@article{031f174976ee48eeb684d770c2642a91,
title = "Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder?",
abstract = "Since the early Cold War Denmark has been part of a cluster of Nordic states characterized by their commitment to Scandinavian welfare state values at home and abroad. However, today Danish foreign policy is at the same time super-Nordic, un-Nordic and anti-Nordic. The role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy has been largely overlooked in the literature on post-Cold War Danish foreign policy, but I identify four different roles for Nordicness in Danish foreign policy: forerunner, follower, bridge builder and exceptionalist. I explore each of these roles discussing what they tell us about the role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy, and how the roles play out in different issue areas and to which extent the importance of each role has changed over time. I argue that while each role depicts Denmark as a fringe Nordic country, Nordicness continues to play an important, but mostly uncredited, as a source of ideas for Danish foreign policy.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Danish foreign policy, Nordic foreign policy, Scandinavia, Small states, role theory, Danish foreign policy, Nordic foreign policy, Scaninavia, small states, role theory",
author = "Anders Wivel",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "419--434",
journal = "Global Affairs",
issn = "2334-0460",
publisher = "the European International Studies Association",
number = "4-5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forerunner, follower, exceptionalist or bridge builder?

AU - Wivel, Anders

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Since the early Cold War Denmark has been part of a cluster of Nordic states characterized by their commitment to Scandinavian welfare state values at home and abroad. However, today Danish foreign policy is at the same time super-Nordic, un-Nordic and anti-Nordic. The role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy has been largely overlooked in the literature on post-Cold War Danish foreign policy, but I identify four different roles for Nordicness in Danish foreign policy: forerunner, follower, bridge builder and exceptionalist. I explore each of these roles discussing what they tell us about the role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy, and how the roles play out in different issue areas and to which extent the importance of each role has changed over time. I argue that while each role depicts Denmark as a fringe Nordic country, Nordicness continues to play an important, but mostly uncredited, as a source of ideas for Danish foreign policy.

AB - Since the early Cold War Denmark has been part of a cluster of Nordic states characterized by their commitment to Scandinavian welfare state values at home and abroad. However, today Danish foreign policy is at the same time super-Nordic, un-Nordic and anti-Nordic. The role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy has been largely overlooked in the literature on post-Cold War Danish foreign policy, but I identify four different roles for Nordicness in Danish foreign policy: forerunner, follower, bridge builder and exceptionalist. I explore each of these roles discussing what they tell us about the role of Nordicness in Danish foreign policy, and how the roles play out in different issue areas and to which extent the importance of each role has changed over time. I argue that while each role depicts Denmark as a fringe Nordic country, Nordicness continues to play an important, but mostly uncredited, as a source of ideas for Danish foreign policy.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Danish foreign policy

KW - Nordic foreign policy

KW - Scandinavia

KW - Small states

KW - role theory

KW - Danish foreign policy

KW - Nordic foreign policy

KW - Scaninavia

KW - small states

KW - role theory

U2 - 10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016

DO - 10.1080/23340460.2018.1557016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 419

EP - 434

JO - Global Affairs

JF - Global Affairs

SN - 2334-0460

IS - 4-5

ER -

ID: 213882780