Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons : A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic. / Hansen, Kasper Møller; Olsen, Asmus Leth; Bech, Michael.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1, 2015, p. 767-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Hansen, KM, Olsen, AL & Bech, M 2015, 'Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic', Political Behavior, vol. 37, no. 4, 1, pp. 767-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y

APA

Hansen, K. M., Olsen, A. L., & Bech, M. (2015). Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic. Political Behavior, 37(4), 767-789. [1]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y

Vancouver

Hansen KM, Olsen AL, Bech M. Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic. Political Behavior. 2015;37(4):767-789. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y

Author

Hansen, Kasper Møller ; Olsen, Asmus Leth ; Bech, Michael. / Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons : A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic. In: Political Behavior. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 767-789.

Bibtex

@article{ebe2bc7a1919430e95d62403aca60c74,
title = "Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic",
abstract = "Comparing performance between countries is both a theoretically and intuitively useful yardstick for voters. Cross-national comparisons provide voters with heuristics that are less cognitively demanding, less ambiguous, and less uncertain than solely national, absolute performance measurements. We test this proposition using a unique, choice experiment embedded in the 2011 Danish National Election Study. This design allows to contrast cross-national comparisons with more traditional national sociotropic and egotropic concerns. The findings suggest that voters are strongly influenced by cross-national performance comparisons—even when accounting for classic national sociotropic and egotropic items. Specifically, voters respond strongly to how the prospective wealth of Denmark evolves relative to the neighboring Sweden. Interestingly, voters are more negative in their response to cross-national losses compared to their positive response to cross-national gains—indicating a negativity bias in voters{\textquoteright} preferences.",
author = "Hansen, {Kasper M{\o}ller} and Olsen, {Asmus Leth} and Michael Bech",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "767--789",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons

T2 - A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic

AU - Hansen, Kasper Møller

AU - Olsen, Asmus Leth

AU - Bech, Michael

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Comparing performance between countries is both a theoretically and intuitively useful yardstick for voters. Cross-national comparisons provide voters with heuristics that are less cognitively demanding, less ambiguous, and less uncertain than solely national, absolute performance measurements. We test this proposition using a unique, choice experiment embedded in the 2011 Danish National Election Study. This design allows to contrast cross-national comparisons with more traditional national sociotropic and egotropic concerns. The findings suggest that voters are strongly influenced by cross-national performance comparisons—even when accounting for classic national sociotropic and egotropic items. Specifically, voters respond strongly to how the prospective wealth of Denmark evolves relative to the neighboring Sweden. Interestingly, voters are more negative in their response to cross-national losses compared to their positive response to cross-national gains—indicating a negativity bias in voters’ preferences.

AB - Comparing performance between countries is both a theoretically and intuitively useful yardstick for voters. Cross-national comparisons provide voters with heuristics that are less cognitively demanding, less ambiguous, and less uncertain than solely national, absolute performance measurements. We test this proposition using a unique, choice experiment embedded in the 2011 Danish National Election Study. This design allows to contrast cross-national comparisons with more traditional national sociotropic and egotropic concerns. The findings suggest that voters are strongly influenced by cross-national performance comparisons—even when accounting for classic national sociotropic and egotropic items. Specifically, voters respond strongly to how the prospective wealth of Denmark evolves relative to the neighboring Sweden. Interestingly, voters are more negative in their response to cross-national losses compared to their positive response to cross-national gains—indicating a negativity bias in voters’ preferences.

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y

DO - 10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 767

EP - 789

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 4

M1 - 1

ER -

ID: 130522933