Border control and blurred responsibilities at the airport

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Documents

Border Security at Copenhagen Airport is maintained on a daily basis through the activities, intents and perspectives of a multiple and unstable assemblage of public and private actors and technologies. Two opposed types of motivations play the leading roles in this work: on the one hand, securing the national borders against what are defined as intruders and threats and, on the other, a general pursuit of economic advantage and profit. Security plays a part in both, in itself becoming a negotiable commodity.
Based on fieldwork among border police in Copenhagen Airport, the chapter examines two instances of control where the actual processes of decision-making and allocation of responsibilities and authority are blurred. The examples concern, for one, the negotiations for setting an acceptable threshold for facial recognition in an automated border control technology, and, secondly, the discretionary work of individual border guards in the profiling of passengers and the detection of potential threats.
As the chapter shows, the airport is a privileged site for analysing the blurring of security responsibilities, decision-making and ongoing negotiations between different parties, because border security is produced by both public and private actors, and because the economic and the security stakes in this place are so obviously entwined and guide most interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSecurity Blurs : The Politics of Plural Security Provision
EditorsTessa Diphoorn, Erella Grassiani
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Publication date2019
Pages118-135
Chapter7
ISBN (Print)978-0-8153-5676-9
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-351-12738-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Research areas

  • Faculty of Social Sciences - security studies, airport studies, technology, border control, policing, political economy, threshold negotiations, discretion, random checks

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 201236809